I am reading something on the Laplace method of integrals and I don't understand part of it's argument. It gives the integral $$\int_{-3}^4 e^{-\lambda x^2}\log(1+x^2)dx$$ and finding the leading term of asymptotics for $\lambda\to\infty$. It first argues
"Since only small $|x|$, such that $|x| \sim \frac{1}{\sqrt{\lambda}} \ll 1$ are important,
$$\log(1+x^2)\sim x^2$$
$$I(\lambda)\sim \int_{-3}^4 e^{-\lambda x^2}x^2 \, dx \sim \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-\lambda x^2}x^2 \, dx \sim 2\int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-\lambda x^2}x^2 \, dx." $$
I'm really not following that argument at all. Any help would be appreciated.
In your case you have something that looks like $$\int_a^b e^{\lambda f(x)} g(x)\,dx,$$ not just $$\int_a^b e^{\lambda f(x)}\,dx.$$ In this situation you need to replace both $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ with their approximations $f_0(x)$ and $g_0(x)$ near $x_0$.
In your example $f(x) = -x^2$ doesn't have a simpler approximation near $x_0 = 0$, so we can just take $$f_0(x) \stackrel{\text{def}}{=} f(x) = -x^2.$$ Now $g(x) = \log(1+x^2)$ and $g(x) \sim x^2 \stackrel{\text{def}}{=} g_0(x)$ near $x = x_0 = 0$, and the Laplace method says that $$\int_a^b e^{\lambda f(x)} g(x)\,dx \sim \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{\lambda f_0(x)} g_0(x)\,dx.$$