My textbook states the following:
i) If $ f : [a,b] \rightarrow \mathbb{R} $ is bounded and is continuous at all but finitely many points of $[a,b]$, then it is integrable on $[a,b]$.
ii) Any increasing or decreasing function on $[a,b]$ is integrable on $[a,b]$.
The proof for (i) is clear to me. I followed the entirety of it. My issue is with (ii). Is boundedness and continuity not necessary for (ii), or are they somehow implied by being strictly increasing/decreasing?
I suspect that by increasing and decreasing they mean that it's increasing / decreasing on the entire domain, which is $\mathbb{R}$. So it's defined everywhere on $\mathbb{R}$. Since it's defined everywhere, it's bounded on any compact subset of $\mathbb{R}$ (since any real function attains its supremum on any compact subset).
Continuity is not required for integrability; however, it is the case that continuity needs to be satisfied on all but a finite set of points in an interval. More specifically, the set of discontinuous points in the interval would have to have measure 0. I think that this must be the case for a function that is either decreasing or increasing.