I need to prove that a stochastic process $M_{t} $to be a martingale, is it necessary and sufficient to prove that $E[M_{t}]=M_{0}$ and if so, can it be proved rigorously? Thank you!
2026-04-04 12:36:20.1775306180
Questions on proving a stochastic process to be a martingale
60 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MARTINGALES
- CLT for Martingales
- Find Expected Value of Martingale $X_n$
- Need to find Conditions to get a (sub-)martingale
- Martingale conditional expectation
- Sum of two martingales
- Discrete martingale stopping time
- Optional Stopping Theorem for martingales
- Prove that the following is a martingale
- Are all martingales uniformly integrable
- Cross Variation of stochatic integrals
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
It is necessary but not sufficient. If the only requirement to be a martingale was to have zero expectation, there would not be much point in inventing a special word for it.
As a typical counterexample, let $X$ be a random variable with $P(X=-1) = P(X=1) = 1/2$. Let $M_t = tX$. Then $E[M_t]=M_0=0$ for all $t$, but for example, you can check that $E[M_2 \mid M_1] = 2 M_1 \ne M_1$, so this process is not a martingale.
The "fairness" requirement of a martingale is that no matter what has happened up to time $s$, the (conditional) expected change in the process's value over a future increment of time is 0. In the example above, if $M_1 = 1$ then the process is guaranteed to increase from then on, and the conditional expected change is positive.