I am sure that this problem is really simple but now I can not see the solution. Let $A$ be a matrix $m\times m$ with full rank. Then, we change all the components $A(j,j)$ by $-\sum_{k,k\neq j} A(j,k)$, where $j$ is the row number. I have made simulations with random matrix and after the change the rank of the new matrix is $m-1$. Why?. I see that in every row we have a term that is a linear combination of the term from the other rows. But I do not see how to demonstrate the reduction of the rank.
2026-04-04 10:18:04.1775297884
rank of a matrix if one component of each row is a linear combination of the others
265 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in MATRICES
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Particular commutator matrix is strictly lower triangular, or at least annihilates last base vector
- Inverse of a triangular-by-block $3 \times 3$ matrix
- Form square matrix out of a non square matrix to calculate determinant
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Eiegenspectrum on subtracting a diagonal matrix
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
Related Questions in MATRIX-RANK
- Bases for column spaces
- relation between rank of power of a singular matrix with the algebraic multiplicity of zero
- How to determine the rank of the following general $\mathbb{R}$-linear transformation.
- How to prove the dimension identity of subspace? i.e. $\dim(V_1) + \dim(V_2) = \dim(V_1 + V_2) + \dim(V_1 \cap V_2)$
- How can I prove that $[T]_B$ is a reversible matrix?
- can I have $\det(A+B)=0$ if $\det(A)=0$ and $\det(B) \neq 0$?
- Let $A$ be a diagonalizable real matrix such as $A^3=A$. Prove that $\mbox{rank}(A) = \mbox{tr}(A^2)$
- Row permuation of a matrix for a non-zero diagonal
- Tensor rank as a first order formula
- Rank of Matrix , Intersection of 3 planes
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Denote column $i$ by $A_i$. The matrix has full rank, so it's columns are linearly independent. Namely $ \sum_i A_i \neq 0$, where $0$ is the zero vector.
Now for every diagonal entry $A(j,j)$, replace it with negative the sum of all other entries in that row, call this new matrix $B$. Then clearly $ \sum_i B_i = 0$ (can you see why?). This means that the columns are no longer linearly independent. In other words, $A$ has reduced in rank when it becomes $B$: $$ rank(B) < m . $$
To compute the rank exactly, we apply elementary column operations to kill the last column. Recall that the rank of a matrix is unchanged by elementary operations on rows or columns: $$ \begin{cases} \mbox{Add column } 1 \mbox{ to column } m \\ \mbox{Add column } 2 \mbox{ to column } m \\ \dots \\ \mbox{Add column } m-1 \mbox{ to column } m \end{cases}$$
Check yourself that $B$ now has columns $B_1 , B_2 , B_{m-1}, 0 $. But the first $m-1$ columns are linearly independent, since the columns of $A$ were linearly independent. To see this, assume there were coefficients $\beta_1, ..., \beta_{m-1}$, not all $0$, such that $$ \sum_{i=1}^{m-1} \beta_i B_i = 0 .$$ This would mean that the first row of $B$ sums to $0$: $$ \beta_1 B(1,1) + \beta_2 B(1,2) + \dots + \beta_{m-1} B(1, m-1) = 0 $$ $$ \implies - \beta_1 \left( \sum_{k=2}^{m} A(1,k) \right) + \beta_2 A(1,2) + \dots + \beta_{m-1} A(1, m-1) = 0 $$ $$ \implies - \beta_1 A(1,m) + \sum_{k=1}^{m-1} \beta_k A(1,k) = 0 $$
By full rankness of $A$, this last equality is true if and only if the coefficients were all $0$, a contradiction.
Therefore the first $m-1$ columns of $B$ are linearly independent. Namely, $$ rank(B)=m-1 .$$