Any actuary or anyone studying mathematics of finance out there? Please help me out. How can I prove or show that $ d< d^{(m)}< \delta< i^{(m)}<i,$ for $m > 1$. Thanks a lot !!!
2026-03-25 17:44:00.1774460640
Ranking $ d, i, d^{(m)}, i^{(m)}, \delta$
390 Views Asked by user175306 https://math.techqa.club/user/user175306/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FINANCE
- Compute the net present value of this project in dependance of the interest rate p.
- Maximizing profit when demand is a power function
- How do I calculate if 2 stocks are negatively correlated?
- Why does the least risky portfolio have large weight on the eigenvectors with small eigenvalues?
- FM Actuary question, comparing interest rate and Discount rate
- Monthly effective interest rate to 6-month effective interest rate
- Annual interest rate compounded monthly to monthly effective interest rate
- Withdrawing monthly from a bank for 40 years
- PMT equation result
- Fair value of European Call
Related Questions in ACTUARIAL-SCIENCE
- FM Actuary question, comparing interest rate and Discount rate
- What are common parameters to use when using Makeham's Law to model mortality in the real world?
- Probability: Negative binomial mode trouble (Exam P SOA 140)
- Tail Value at Risk of Normal Distribution
- Mean and Variance of Random Sum of Random Variables
- Sample Variance Definition Disparity
- Conditional Hazard Function in Frailty Models
- Where have I gone wrong? Compound interest
- How much should they deposit to reach their goal?
- Help with accuracy: The first payment will be made in exactly one month. The effective annual rate of interest is 8 %. Determine the value of X
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Let us make the following assumptions regarding notation:
Let us further assume that $d, d^{(m)}, \delta, i^{(m)}, i$ are non-zero.
Then, by definition, $1+i = \left( {1+\frac{i^{(m)}}{m}} \right) ^m$ and $(1-d)^{-1} = \left( {1-\frac{d^{(m)}}{m}} \right) ^{-m}$.
Also, by definition, $1+i = (1-d)^{-1} = e^{\delta}$.
Now we know that $d^{(1)} = d$ and that $i^{(1)} = i$ and we also know that $d^{(\infty)}=i^{(\infty)}=\delta$.
We can show that $d<d^{(m)}<\delta<i^{(m)}<i$ for $m>1$ if we can show that $d^{(m)}$ is strictly increasing in $m$ and that $i^{(m)}$ is strictly decreasing in $m$ with $m>1$.
For clarity, recall that
$$ \left( {1+\frac{i^{(m)}}{m}} \right)^m = e^{\delta} \implies {1+\frac{i^{(m)}}{m}} = e^{\delta / m} \implies i^{(m)} = m\left(e^{\delta / m}-1\right)$$
So we have
$$\frac{d}{d m} i^{(m)} = e^{\delta / m}-1 + m\left(-\frac{\delta}{m^2} e^{\delta / m}\right) = e^{\delta / m}-1 -\frac{\delta}{m} e^{\delta / m} = e^{\delta / m}\left(1 -\frac{\delta}{m} - e^{-\delta / m}\right)$$
Recall the Taylor expansion
$$e^{-x} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-x)^n}{n!} = 1 - x + \frac{x^2}{2!} - \frac{x^3}{3!} + \dots $$
Hence $e^{-x} > 1-x$ for $x \neq 0$. For negative $x$ this should be clear; for positive $x$ notice how every negative term after $\frac{x^2}{2!}$ in the expansion is succeeded by an absolutely larger positive term.
So
$$ e^{-\delta / m} > 1 -\frac{\delta}{m} \implies 1 -\frac{\delta}{m} - e^{-\delta / m} < 0 \implies \frac{d}{d m} i^{(m)} < 0$$
So $i^{(m)}$ is strictly decreasing in $m$; in particular, $i^{(m)}$ is strictly decreasing for $m>1$.
Hence
$$\delta<i^{(m)}<i$$
Now
$$ \left( {1-\frac{d^{(m)}}{m}} \right)^{-m} = e^{\delta} \implies {1-\frac{d^{(m)}}{m}} = e^{-\delta / m} \implies d^{(m)} = m\left(-e^{-\delta / m}+1\right)$$
Differentiating with respect to $m$, we have
$$\frac{d}{d m} d^{(m)} = -e^{-\delta / m}+1 + m\left(-\frac{\delta}{m^2} e^{-\delta / m}\right) = -e^{-\delta / m}+1 -\frac{\delta}{m} e^{-\delta / m} = -e^{-\delta / m}\left(1 +\frac{\delta}{m} - e^{\delta / m}\right)$$
Now recall that
$$e^{x} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{x^n}{n!} = 1 + x + \frac{x^2}{2!} + \frac{x^3}{3!} + \dots $$
So $e^{x} > 1+x$ for $x>0$. Hence
$$ e^{\delta / m} > 1 + \frac{\delta}{m} \implies 1 +\frac{\delta}{m} - e^{\delta / m} < 0 \implies \frac{d}{d m} d^{(m)} > 0$$
So we have shown that $d^{(m)}$ is strictly increasing in $m$. In particular, $d^{(m)}$ is strictly increasing for $m > 1$. Hence
$$\delta>d^{(m)}>d$$
Putting these inequalities together, we have $d<d^{(m)}<\delta<i^{(m)}<i$, as required.