I am new to quaternions and currently trying to learn it. Here is my doubt. Let $\bf{q}$ be a quaternion whose norm is defined as $\|\bf{q}\| = \sqrt{q\otimes q^*}$. As you see, this norm is a scalar quantity. We'ld expect that the rate of change of this scalar quantity is also scalar (or, am I wrong in assuming that). The rate of change of this norm is computed as: \begin{equation} \begin{split} \frac{d}{dt}\|\bf{q}\| &= \frac{d}{dt}\left(\bf{q}\otimes \bf{q}^*\right)^{1/2}\\ &= \frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{\|\bf{q}\|}\left(\dot{\bf{q}}\otimes \bf{q}^* + \bf{q}\otimes \dot{\bf{q}^*}\right) \end{split} \end{equation} We see that the denominator is a scalar quantity, but since $\bf{q}$ is vector, the numerator is also vector, resulting into the rate of change of a scalar quantity being vector. Am I doing something wrong?
2026-04-01 14:07:59.1775052479
Rate of change of norm of a quaternion
49 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-TRANSFORMATIONS
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- A different way to define homomorphism.
- Linear algebra: what is the purpose of passive transformation matrix?
- Find matrix representation based on two vector transformations
- Is $A$ satisfying ${A^2} = - I$ similar to $\left[ {\begin{smallmatrix} 0&I \\ { - I}&0 \end{smallmatrix}} \right]$?
- Let $T:V\to W$ on finite dimensional vector spaces, is it possible to use the determinant to determine that $T$ is invertible.
- Basis-free proof of the fact that traceless linear maps are sums of commutators
- Assuming that A is the matrix of a linear operator F in S find the matrix B of F in R
- For what $k$ is $g_k\circ f_k$ invertible?
Related Questions in ROTATIONS
- Properties of a eclipse on a rotated plane to see a perfect circle from the original plane view?
- why images are related by an affine transformation in following specific case?(background in computer vision required)
- Proving equations with respect to skew-symmetric matrix property
- Finding matrix linear transformation
- A property of orthogonal matrices
- Express 2D point coordinates in a rotated and translated CS
- explicit description of eigenvector of a rotation
- Finding the Euler angle/axis from a 2 axes rotation but that lies on the original 2 axes' plane
- How to find a rectangle's rotation amount that is inscribed inside an axis-aligned rectangle?
- Change of basis with rotation matrices
Related Questions in QUATERNIONS
- Intuition behind quaternion multiplication with zero scalar
- Universal cover $\mathbb{S}^3 \rightarrow SO(3)$ through Quaternions.
- Variance of a set of quaternions?
- Finding the Euler angle/axis from a 2 axes rotation but that lies on the original 2 axes' plane
- How many different quaternions $q$ are in a satisfying equation $q^2 = 1$?
- Dual quaternions displacement
- Why quaternions is a group?
- Why does the real part of quaternion conjugation with a pure quaternion stay 0?
- Why does the multiplication in a division algebra depends on every component?
- derive quaternion from rotation matrix, via eigenvector
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Too long for a comment and correction to one of my comments.
The author of the paper you cited in the comments uses $\mathbf{p}\otimes\mathbf{q}$ to denote the quaternion product. He writes each quaternion as $$\mathbf{q}=\begin{bmatrix}q_w\\\mathbf{q}_v\end{bmatrix}\,,\;q_w\in\mathbb R\,\,,\;\mathbf{q}_v\in\mathbb{R}^3\,.$$ Then
The complex conjugate of a quaternion $\mathbf{q}$ flips the sign of its imaginary part $\mathbf{q}_v\,.$ Since $(-\mathbf{p}_v)\times(-\mathbf{q}_v)=\mathbf{p}_v\times\mathbf{q}_v=-\mathbf{q}_v\times\mathbf{p}_v$ we get from (13)
$$\tag{1} (\mathbf{p}\otimes\mathbf{q})^*=\mathbf{q}^*\otimes\mathbf{p}^*\,. $$ Differentiation of $\mathbf{q}\otimes\mathbf{q}$ gives the sum of
\begin{align}\tag{2} \dot{\mathbf{q}}\otimes\mathbf{q}^*\quad\text{ and }\quad\mathbf{q}\otimes\dot{\mathbf{q}}^* \end{align} which are both quaternions having possible non zero imaginary parts. In other words: in your language they are vectors in general.
From (1) $$ (\dot{\mathbf{q}}\otimes\mathbf{q}^*)^*=\mathbf{q}\otimes \dot{\mathbf{q}}^*\,. $$ That is: the "vectors" in (2) are conjugate to each other. Therefore their sum is the sum of their scalar parts and hence a scalar as it must.