When calculating the measure of Q in real number interval [0, 1], an interval $ (q_n-\epsilon, q_n + \epsilon)$ around each rational number $ q_n $ is defined to show the measure of Q is zero.
- Is it possible to find such interval to cover single rational number?
- Do the rational numbers exist as if they are points in that real number interval?
However small the $ \epsilon $ is, there must be irrational numbers in $ (q_n-\epsilon, q_n + \epsilon)$ which means that there is at least one more rational number because the Q is dense.
I think I missed something, but I don't know what it is.
When covering the rationals bit small intervals you are right: there will be overlap, but that's not a problem. The point is that you will still get stuff less than $\epsilon$ overall, so it's still OK.
For example: cover the $n^{th}$ rational by an interval of size $\epsilon 2^{-n}$ then the total sum of all the rational lengths is
$$\sum_{n=1}^\infty \epsilon2^{-n}=\epsilon$$
so that the rationals have measure $\mu(\Bbb Q)\le \epsilon$ for every $\epsilon >0$, by the monotonicity of a measure, remember
with equality only occasionally. Hence the rationals have measure $0$, since we can cover them by a set of as small a measure as we like. It doesn't matter if the intervals over count things, so long as they get everything, there can be some extra.