I have to prove that if $f,g : [a,b]\longrightarrow \mathbb{R}$ are Riemann integrable functions such that $\underline{S}(f,P)=\underline{S}(g,P)$ for any partition $P$ of $[a,b]$, then $\int\limits_{r}^{s}f=\int\limits_{r}^{s}g$ for any $r,s \in [a,b], r<s$. Here's what I have tried: Trivially, $\int\limits_{a}^{b}f=\int\limits_{a}^{b}g$, and also I proved that both $f$ and $g$ are integrable on $[r,s]$ and $$ \int\limits_{a}^{b}f=\int\limits_{a}^{r}f+\int\limits_{r}^{s}f+\int\limits_{s}^{b}f=\int\limits_{a}^{r}g+\int\limits_{r}^{s}g+\int\limits_{s}^{b}g=\int\limits_{a}^{b}g$$ Also, there exists a sequence of partitions $P_n$ such that both $r$ and $s$ are the limits of intervals in $P_n$, and the differences of upper sums minus lower sums of both $f$ and $g$ of the corresponding partitions of the intervals $[a,r]$,$[r,s]$ and $[s,b]$ (partitions which are subsets of $P_n$) are all less than any $\varepsilon>0$. I now want to express the integral $\int\limits_{r}^{s}g$ as the limit of lower sums of $f$ using this sequence of partitions, but have been stuck for a while trying to figure out how. Any ideas on how to develop my idea or solve the problem in any other way would be appreciated.
2026-04-01 00:24:19.1775003059
Real analysis: if two Riemann integrable functions have equivalent lower sums for any partition, their integrals are the same on any subinterval.
107 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in RIEMANN-INTEGRATION
- Riemann Integrability of a function and its reciprocal
- How to evaluate a Riemann (Darboux?) integral?
- Reimann-Stieltjes Integral and Expectation for Discrete Random Variable
- Hint required : Why is the integral $\int_0^x \frac{\sin(t)}{1+t}\mathrm{d}t$ positive?
- Method for evaluating Darboux integrals by a sequence of partitions?
- Proof verification: showing that $f(x) = \begin{cases}1, & \text{if $x = 0$} \\0,&\text{if $x \ne 0$}\end{cases}$ is Riemann integrable?
- prove a function is integrable not just with limits
- Intervals where $f$ is Riemann integrable?
- Understanding extended Riemann integral in Munkres.
- Lebesgue-integrating a non-Riemann integrable function
Related Questions in RIEMANN-SUM
- Which type of Riemann Sum is the most accurate?
- How to evaluate a Riemann (Darboux?) integral?
- Hint required : Why is the integral $\int_0^x \frac{\sin(t)}{1+t}\mathrm{d}t$ positive?
- Method for evaluating Darboux integrals by a sequence of partitions?
- How to tell whether a left and right riemann sum are overestiamtes and underestimates?
- Calculating an integral using the limit definition
- How to express a Riemann sum as a definite integral
- Proof of $\int_{a}^{a} f(x)dx = 0$
- A confusion about the proof of Darboux Criterion
- $\int _0^ax\left(1-\frac{x}{a}\right)dx\:$ using Riemann Sums
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
An equivalent statement is that $\underline S(f-g,P) = 0$ for every $P$.
So what does it say about a function $h$ that $\underline S(h,P) = 0$ for every $P$?
Now $\underline S(h,[a,b]) = (b-a)\inf_{[a,b]} h = 0$, so $\inf_{[a,b]} h = 0$. Suppose there is an $c \in (a,b)$ with $\inf_{[a,c]} h \ne 0$. That would mean $\inf_{[c,b]} h = 0$, since $\inf_{[a,b]} h = \min\{\inf_{[a,c]} h, \inf_{[c,b]} h\}$. But then $$\underline S(h, \{[a,c],[c,b]\}) = (c-a)\inf_{[a,c]} h + (b-c) 0 \ne 0$$
which cannot be. So for every $c \in (a,b), \inf_{[a,c]} h = 0$. And similarly $\inf_{[c,b]} h = 0$. The same calculation again shows that for any $[c,d] \subset (a,b), \inf_{[c,d]} h = 0$.
Therefore it is not just any partition $P$ of $[a,b]$ for which $\underline S(h,P) = 0$, but also any partition of any sub interval of $[a,b]$, including $[r,s]$.