I'm currently learning about supremums but I'm having trouble understanding them.
I understand that for a number M to be the sup(S) it satisfy two conditions:
(1) M is an upper bound of S. (2) If M' is any upper bound of S then $M \leq M'$
The first condition is just saying that for all $ s \in S$, $s \leq M$. Right?
I see why the second condition is true.. But I don't really understand how to use it.
I don't understand how to use it when evaluating problems dealing with supremums. How do we prove that for any upper bound $M'$ of set S, $M \leq M'$.
$$$$
Also, I'm having trouble with the following example:
Let $a_n$ and $b_n$ be two bounded sequences of real numbers, show that: $$sup(a_n + b_n) \leq sup(a_n) + sup(b_n)$$
You can show that $\forall \epsilon >0$,$M-\epsilon$ is not an upper bound. That is $\exists s \in S$,such at $s>M-\epsilon$
For your second question, you just need to show $\sup(a_n) + \sup(b_n)$ is an upper bound of all $a_n + b_n$. Hence the inequality must hold by definition.