How does one construct an $n$-dimensional, irreducible, real-valued and non-zero representation of the three generators of the Lie algebra $\mathfrak{so}(3)$ for a given value of $n$?
2026-05-05 07:58:54.1777967934
Real representations of Lie algebra $\mathfrak{so}(3)$
657 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MATRICES
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Particular commutator matrix is strictly lower triangular, or at least annihilates last base vector
- Inverse of a triangular-by-block $3 \times 3$ matrix
- Form square matrix out of a non square matrix to calculate determinant
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Eiegenspectrum on subtracting a diagonal matrix
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
Related Questions in NUMERICAL-METHODS
- The Runge-Kutta method for a system of equations
- How to solve the exponential equation $e^{a+bx}+e^{c+dx}=1$?
- Is the calculated solution, if it exists, unique?
- Modified conjugate gradient method to minimise quadratic functional restricted to positive solutions
- Minimum of the 2-norm
- Is method of exhaustion the same as numerical integration?
- Prove that Newton's Method is invariant under invertible linear transformations
- Initial Value Problem into Euler and Runge-Kutta scheme
- What are the possible ways to write an equation in $x=\phi(x)$ form for Iteration method?
- Numerical solution for a two dimensional third order nonlinear differential equation
Related Questions in REPRESENTATION-THEORY
- How does $\operatorname{Ind}^G_H$ behave with respect to $\bigoplus$?
- Minimal dimension needed for linearization of group action
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Assuming unitarity of arbitrary representations in proof of Schur's lemma
- Are representation isomorphisms of permutation representations necessarily permutation matrices?
- idempotent in quiver theory
- Help with a definition in Serre's Linear Representations of Finite Groups
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- Properties of symmetric and alternating characters
- Representation theory of $S_3$
Related Questions in LIE-ALGEBRAS
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Computing the logarithm of an exponentiated matrix?
- Need help with notation. Is this lower dot an operation?
- On uniparametric subgroups of a Lie group
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- $SU(2)$ adjoint and fundamental transformations
- Radical of Der(L) where L is a Lie Algebra
- $SU(3)$ irreps decomposition in subgroup irreps
- Given a representation $\phi: L \rightarrow \mathfrak {gl}(V)$ $\phi(L)$ in End $V$ leaves invariant precisely the same subspaces as $L$.
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
A google search lead me to this paper
V. M. Gordienko
Matrix entries of real representations of the group O(3) and SO(3)
Siberian Mathematical Journal (2002), 43(1):36-46
DOI: 10.1023/A:1013816403253
which describes the construction of the real representations of $SO(3)$ using homogeneous polynomials $$ \begin{align} P^{(N)}(x,y) =& a_1 x^{2N} + a_2 x^{2N-1} y + a_3 x^{2N-2} y^2 + \ldots \\ & + a_{N+1} x^{N} y^{N} + \ldots + a_{2N} x y^{2N-1} + a_{2N+1} y^{2N} \end{align} $$ in $x$ and $y$ with $x,y \in \mathbb{C}$. Gordienko chooses the following basis in the vector space of polynomials $P^{(N)}(x,y)$ $$ \begin{align} e^{(N)}_n(x,y) =& i^{N+1}\sqrt{\frac{(2N+1)!}{2(N-n)!(N+n)!}} \\ &\times(x^{N-n}y^{N+n} - (-1)^{-n}x^{N+n}y^{N-n}) \quad \mathrm{if}\; n \le -1 \notag\\ e^{(N)}_{n=0}(x,y) =& i^{N} \frac{\sqrt{(2N+1)!}}{N!} x^N y^N \quad \mathrm{if}\; n = 0 \notag\\ e^{(N)}_n(x,y) =& -i^{N}\sqrt{\frac{(2N+1)!}{2(N+n)!(N-n)!}} \notag\\ & \times(x^{N+n}y^{N-n} + (-1)^{n}x^{N-n}y^{N+n}) \quad \mathrm{if}\; n \ge 1 \notag \end{align} $$ with $n = -N,\ldots,N$. The point of this particular construction is, that $e^{(N)}_n(x,y) = (e^{(N)}_n(-y,x))^*$.
Now she/he takes a generic rotation matrix from the group $SU(2)$, parametrized by the three real numbers $\alpha$, $\beta$ and $\gamma$ and writes with $\delta\equiv\sqrt{1-\alpha^2-\beta^2-\gamma^2}$ $$ M = \begin{pmatrix} \delta - i\gamma & \beta -i\alpha\\ -\beta - i\alpha &\delta + i\gamma \end{pmatrix} \equiv \begin{pmatrix} A^* & B^*\\ -B & A \end{pmatrix} $$ The rotation matrix $M$ is then applied on the 2-dimensional complex vector $(x,y)$, i.e. $$ (x',y') \equiv (x,y) \begin{pmatrix} A^* & B^*\\ -B & A \end{pmatrix}=(A^*x-By, B^*x+Ay) $$ For the "rotated" basis $e^{(N)}_n(x',y')$ Gordienko obtains $$ \begin{align} e^{(N)}_n(x',y') =& e^{(N)}_n(A^*x-By, B^*x+Ay) \\ =& \sum_{m=-N}^{+N} R^{(N)}_{n,m}(A,B) \; e^{(N)}_m(x,y)\notag \end{align} $$ The $(2N+1)\times(2N+1)$ matrix $R^{(N)}_{m,n}(A,B)$ is the $(2N+1)$-dimensional representation of SO(3), I was looking for.
Why is the matrix $R^{(N)}_{m,n}(A,B)$ real-valued? Gordienko shows that for basis vectors with the property $$ e^{(N)}_m(x,y) = (e^{(N)}_m(-y,x))^* $$ the entries of the representation matrices $R^{(N)}_{n,m}(A,B)$ are indeed real. Specifically, $$ \begin{align} e^{(N)}_m(x',y') =& e^{(N)}_m(A^*x-By, B^*x+Ay) \\ =& (e^{(N)}_m(-B^*x-Ay,A^*x-By))^* \notag\\ =& (e^{(N)}_m(B^*(-x)+A(-y),A^*x-By))^* \notag\\ =& (e^{(N)}_m(-y',x'))^* \notag\\ =& (\sum_{n=-N}^N R^{(N)}_{m,n}(A,B)\;e^{(N)}_n(-y,x))^* \notag\\ =& \sum_{n=-N}^N (R^{(N)}_{m,n}(A,B))^*\;(e^{(N)}_n(-y,x))^* \notag\\ =& \sum_{n=-N}^N (R^{(N)}_{m,n}(A,B))^*\;e^{(N)}_n(x,y) \notag \end{align} $$ Thus, $R^{(N)}_{m,n}(A,B) = (R^{(N)}_{m,n}(A,B))^*$ since the $e^{(N)}_n(x,y)$ are linear independent; in other words, the matrix $R^{(N)}_{m,n}(A,B)$ is real.
In my blog the three generators of $\mathfrak{so}(3)$ in 3, 5 and 7 dimensions obtained by this technique are given explicitly.