Given a finite complex Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$ with simple roots $\alpha_i$. Denote $\Lambda_k$ the highest weight in the k-th fundamental representation so that $$(\check\alpha_i,\Lambda^k)={\delta_i}^k$$ If the rank of the Lie algebra is $n$ then there should be $n+1$ states in this representation. So to my understanding we may just represent states using a tensor with one index $T_i$ for example and ask $i$ to range from $1$ to $n+1$. Why then do we realise states in this representation by a $n-k$ anti-sytmmetric tensor $T^{i_1...i_{n-k}}$?
2026-04-13 00:49:16.1776041356
Realise fundamental representation on multi-indexed total-antisymmetric tensors?
35 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REPRESENTATION-THEORY
- How does $\operatorname{Ind}^G_H$ behave with respect to $\bigoplus$?
- Minimal dimension needed for linearization of group action
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Assuming unitarity of arbitrary representations in proof of Schur's lemma
- Are representation isomorphisms of permutation representations necessarily permutation matrices?
- idempotent in quiver theory
- Help with a definition in Serre's Linear Representations of Finite Groups
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- Properties of symmetric and alternating characters
- Representation theory of $S_3$
Related Questions in LIE-ALGEBRAS
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Computing the logarithm of an exponentiated matrix?
- Need help with notation. Is this lower dot an operation?
- On uniparametric subgroups of a Lie group
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- $SU(2)$ adjoint and fundamental transformations
- Radical of Der(L) where L is a Lie Algebra
- $SU(3)$ irreps decomposition in subgroup irreps
- Given a representation $\phi: L \rightarrow \mathfrak {gl}(V)$ $\phi(L)$ in End $V$ leaves invariant precisely the same subspaces as $L$.
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I think there are a number of misapprehensions here possibly due to conflicting naming from physics. Firstly, I'm not sure what "states" means in this context, perhaps a basis for the representation. Secondly "fundamental representation" in maths applies more broadly than in physics. There are in general several fundamental representations which will have different dimensions etc. Indeed there is one for each fundamental weight (resp. simple root) so as many as the rank of the Lie algebra.
What is true goes as follows:
The fundamental representations of $\mathfrak{sl}(n,\mathbb{C})$ (or equivalently $\mathfrak{su}(n)$, $\mathfrak{sl}(n,\mathbb{R})$ and other real forms) are the alternating tensor powers $\bigwedge^k\mathbb{C}^n$, $1\leq k \leq n-1$. These are the representations corresponding to the fundamental weights and have dimension $\begin{pmatrix} n \\ k \end{pmatrix}$. In physics, it is usual to call only $\mathbb{C}^n$ (i.e. $k=1$) the fundamental representation and for example $\bigwedge^{n-1}\mathbb{C}^n \cong (\mathbb{C}^n)^*$ the 'antifundamental' representation.
Fundamental representations of other semisimple Lie algebras are different however. For example, $\mathfrak{so}(n,\mathbb{C})$ has $\bigwedge^k\mathbb{C}^n$ as fundamental representations only up to $k<\frac{n}{2}$ (in fact $\bigwedge^k\mathbb{C}^n \cong \bigwedge^{n-k}\mathbb{C}^n$ in this case) and it has either one or two spin representations depending on the parity of $n$. For $\mathfrak{sp}(n,\mathbb{C})$, $\bigwedge^k\mathbb{C}^n$ is not even irreducible in general so the fundamental representations are subrepresentations of these and don't even get me started on the exceptional ones.
Note "fundamental representation" doesn't even really make sense outside of semisimple Lie algebras as it is firmly based on the weight system of a semisimple Lie algebra.