Is the unit normal vector or the normalized normal vector at a point on a surface the same as "the normal vector" at that same point (and surface)? Does saying, "the normal vector" imply it is normalized? Wolfram Mathworld says:
The normal vector at a point
on a surface is given by

--> If this is the case, why don't people, when referring to a vector at a certain point on a certain surface, just say "the normal vector" instead of "unit normal vector" or "normalized normal vector"
Talking about "a normal vector" is confusing in this context, because of the subtle distinction between normal, which means perpendicular, and normalized, which means of magnitude 1.
Better would have been to say: "The vector normal to the surface at point $(x_0, y_0)$ is given by ..."