Regarding properties of function Dedekind sum in analytic number theory

50 Views Asked by At

I am self studying Tom M. Apostol's Modular Functions and Dirichlet Series in Number Theory and I could not think about a theorem given in Chapter 3. Its proof has been omitted by Apostol.

The theorem is:

If $hh' \equiv +1 \pmod{k}$, then $s(h', k) = + s(h, k)$ and if $hh'\equiv -1 \pmod{k}$, then $s(h', k) = -s(h, k)$.

Here $s(h, k)$ is called Dedekind sum which is equal to $$s(h,k) = \sum_{r=0}^k (( r/k)) ((hr/k))$$ where $(( x)) = x -[x] - 0.5$ if $x$ is not an integer and $((x)) = 0$ if $x$ is an integer, $[x]$ is the greatest integer less than or equal to x.

Please give some hint.

1

There are 1 best solutions below

1
On BEST ANSWER

Note that the function $((\,\cdot\,))$ is odd and has period $1$. Also, since $((x)) = 0$ when$x$ is an integer, the summands for $r = 0$ and $r = k$ vanish, thus we can write $s(h,k)$ in the more conventional form(s) $$s(h,k) = \sum_{r = 0}^{k-1} \biggl(\biggl(\frac{r}{k}\biggr)\biggr)\biggl(\biggl(\frac{hr}{k}\biggr)\biggr) = \sum_{r = 1}^k \biggl(\biggl(\frac{r}{k}\biggr)\biggr)\biggl(\biggl(\frac{hr}{k}\biggr)\biggr)$$ and have the equality $$s(h,k) = \sum_{r = 1}^{k-1} \biggl(\biggl(\frac{r}{k}\biggr)\biggr)\biggl(\biggl(\frac{hr}{k}\biggr)\biggr)\,.$$ By the periodicity we also have $$s(h,k) = \sum_{r \bmod k} \biggl(\biggl(\frac{r}{k}\biggr)\biggr)\biggl(\biggl(\frac{hr}{k}\biggr)\biggr)$$ where the sum extends over an arbitrary complete residue system modulo $k$ (and the class $r \equiv 0 \pmod{k}$ may be included or omitted as convenience suggests).

With these preliminary remarks, in particular the last, we see that for every $a$ coprime to $k$ we may also write $$s(h,k) = \sum_{t = 0}^{k-1} \biggl(\biggl(\frac{at}{k}\biggr)\biggr)\biggl(\biggl(\frac{hat}{k}\biggr)\biggr)$$ because $at$ runs through a complete residue system modulo $k$ if and only if $t$ does.

In this representation, take $a = h'$ (by the assumption $hh' \equiv \pm 1 \pmod{k}$ it follows that $h'$ is coprime to $k$) and reduce $hh't$ in the second factor of each summand modulo $k$. Thus \begin{align} s(h,k) &= \sum_{t = 0}^{k-1} \biggl(\biggl(\frac{h't}{k}\biggr)\biggr)\biggl(\biggl(\frac{hh't}{k}\biggr)\biggr) \\ &= \sum_{t = 0}^{k-1} \biggl(\biggl(\frac{h't}{k}\biggr)\biggr)\biggl(\biggl(\frac{\pm t}{k}\biggr)\biggr) \\ &= \sum_{t = 0}^{k-1} \biggl(\biggl(\frac{\pm t}{k}\biggr)\biggr)\biggl(\biggl(\frac{h't}{k}\biggr)\biggr) \\ &= \pm\sum_{t = 0}^{k-1} \biggl(\biggl(\frac{t}{k}\biggr)\biggr)\biggl(\biggl(\frac{h't}{k}\biggr)\biggr) \\ &= \pm s(h',t)\,, \end{align} where the sign is $+$ or $-$ according to whether $hh' \equiv 1 \pmod{k}$ or $hh' \equiv -1\pmod{k}$, and in the latter case the oddness of $((\,\cdot\,))$ was used at the penultimate equals sign.