Consider two three-dimensional reference frames $F$ and $F'$, related by a rotation matrix $R$. In general, $R^{-1} = R^T.$ The components of a vector $\vec{a} = \sum_{i} a_i \hat{x}_i = \sum_{i} a_i' \hat{x}_i'$ are related by $a_i' = \sum_{j} R_{ij} a_j.$ I would wish to show that $\hat{x}_i' = \sum_j R_{ji} \hat{x}_j$, for which I am having some difficulty with the indices. Here is my work so far:
- I know that $a_i = \sum_{j} R_{ij}^{-1} a_j' = \sum_{j} R_{ji} a_j'.$
- Now, $$\vec{a} = \sum_{i} a_i \hat{x}_i = \sum_{i} a_i' \hat{x}_i' \Rightarrow \sum_i \left(\sum_j R_{ji} a_j'\right) \hat{x}_i = \sum_{i} a_i' \hat{x}_i' \Rightarrow \sum_j \sum_i R_{ij} a_i'\hat{x}_j = \sum_i a_i' \hat{x}_i \Rightarrow ??$$
Somehow, by comparison of the left and right-hand sides, $\hat{x}_i' = \sum_j R_{ji}\hat{x}_j$ should naturally "fall out", but the indices and the double-sums are rendering it difficult for me to see how this is so.
You said
Then, consider, for example, the vector $\hat{x}_1'$ with coordinates $a_1'=1, a_2'=0,\ldots$. Then its coordinates in the other basis are, according to you, $$ a_i=\sum_j R_{ji} a_j'=R_{1i} $$ and therefore $$ \hat{x}_1'=R_{11} \hat{x}_1+\cdots=\sum_j R_{1j} \hat{x}_j $$
But the index 1 has nothing special so in general, and according to you sentence: $$ \hat{x}_i'=\sum_j R_{ij} \hat{x}_j $$
This is not what you want, so if I am right (I don't find any errors in my approach) you have a mistake in your text. If I am wrong let me know.