I am just starting Strogatz's Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos. (Please bear in mind that I'm a high school student - I'm learning this on my own time, not for any sort of school assignment, and my math knowledge isn't too advanced).
For differential equations, Strogatz appears to be defining a "fixed point" as being where $dx/dt = 0$. But when I took Pre-Calculus last year, I believe (if I remember correctly) that when we talked about recursive sequences we defined "fixed point" to be where $x_{n+1} = x_n$.
What is the connection, if any, between the differential equation definition of a fixed point and the sequence definition? I'm finding this quite confusing to think about. I did some research both on this forum and elsewhere but couldn't find anything that completely answered my question in a clear manner.
In one case you get a constant solution, in the other a constant sequence when starting in that point, the dynamic "stays fixed" in this point.
In differential equations also the terms "stationary point" and "equilibrium point" are used to make the distinction of these two situations easier.
You get a better conceptual equality if you consider instead of the fixed-point map in $x_{n+1}=g(x_n)$ the increment map in $x_{n+1}-x_n=f(x_n)$ (with obviously $f(x)=g(x)-x$, requiring the space being a vector space). Then also in this situation a fixed point is characterized by $f(x^*)=0$.
Conversely, you can take the Euler method as an approximation of the differential equation $\dot x=f(x)$ to get a discretized iteration $x_{n+1}=g_h(x_n)=x_n+hf(x_n)$. Then stationary points of the ODE correspond to fixed points of this map $g_h$, and again to $f(x^*)=0$.