The quaternionic group $\mathcal{Q}$ consists of the elements $1$, $-1$, $i$, $-i$,$j$,$-j$,$k$,$-k$ that satisfy the multiplication rules
$$i^2=j^2=k^2=-1$$
$$ ij=-ji=k$$
$$jk=-kj=i$$
$$ki=-ik=j$$
The quaternionic numbers $$a+ib+cj+dk$$ form a division dividion algebra.
In Group Theory in a Nutshell on p61 A.Zee writes that those two structures are completely unrelated, but I almost cant swallow this.
Are the quaternionic group and the quaternionic numbers really completely unrelated?
On
The quaternions $\mathbb{H}$ are a four-dimensional algebra spanned by basis elements $1,\mathbf{i},\mathbf{j},\mathbf{k}$, where $1$ is the multiplicative identity, $\mathbf{i},\mathbf{j},\mathbf{k}$ are three different square roots of $-1$, and $\mathbf{i},\mathbf{j},\mathbf{k}$ satisfy a "cyclic" relation (multiply any two of them in cyclic order, and you get the third, otherwise if you multiply them in the "wrong" order you get the negative of the third). This yields a multiplication table
$$ \begin{array}{l|cccc} & 1 & \mathbf{i} & \mathbf{j} & \mathbf{k} \\ \hline 1 & 1 & \mathbf{i} & \mathbf{j} & \mathbf{k} \\ \mathbf{i} & \mathbf{i} & -1 & \mathbf{k} & -\mathbf{j} \\ \mathbf{j} & \mathbf{j} & -\mathbf{k} & -1 & \mathbf{i} \\ \mathbf{k} & \mathbf{k} & \mathbf{j} & -\mathbf{i} & -1 \end{array} $$
This is just the multiplication table for $\{1,i,j,k\}$ inside $Q_8$! So it turns out, $Q_8$ is literally a group of quaternions (so, a subgroup of $\mathbb{H}^\times$), the same way $\{1,-1\}$ is a group of real numbers and the same way that $\{1,i,-1,-i\}$ is a group of complex numbers. Moreoever, $Z(Q_8)=Q_8\cap Z(\mathbb{H})$ since $Z(\mathbb{H})=\mathbb{R}$, and any transversal for $Q_8/Z(Q_8)$ (so, $\{\pm1,\pm i,\pm j,\pm k\}$ for four choices of signs) will be an orthonormal basis for $\mathbb{H}$ with respect to its natural inner product.
(Hamilton wrote down the relations $i^2=j^2=k^2=ijk=-1$ on the bridge. Exercise: Can you derive the multiplication table from these relations?)
(The reason I use boldface is that it is often helpful to think of a quaternion as a formal combination of a scalar and a vector, $q=r+\mathbf{u}$. Then the product of two purely imaginary quaternions is seen to be $\mathbf{uv}=-\mathbf{u}\cdot\mathbf{v}+\mathbf{u}\times\mathbf{v}$ - notice how the imaginary elements in the above multiplication table match that for the cross product! - and then we can multiply two arbitrary quaternions $(r_1+\mathbf{u}_1)(r_2+\mathbf{u}_2)$ with the distributive property.)
It's silly to say that they are completely unrelated. If you take just those quaternions for which precisely one of $a,b,c,d$ is non-zero, and the one that is non-zero is either 1 or $-1$, you obtain the quaternionic group. On the other hand, if you use the elements of the quaternionic group as the basis of an 8-dimensional vector space over $\mathbb R$, and then add relations to make $-x$ the negation of $x$ for each element of the group (creating a 4-dimensional vector space), and define a multiplication on that vector space by using the multiplication rules of the quaternionic group, you get precisely the algebra of the quaternions.
Presumably, your book just wanted to emphasize that you should not confuse the two structures, as one is a group under multiplication, while one is an ($\mathbb R$-, or $\mathbb C$-)algebra.