I have been thinking about this. Lets say we take 7 divided by 3, we know the remainder is 1. However, if we let x=7 and x-4=3, and we take x/(x-4), after performing long division the remainder is 4. Why is it not 1?
Remainder and long division
42 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail AtThere are 3 best solutions below
On
If someone handed you $x$ and $x-4$, why would you assume that they are $7$ and $3$?
In general, we know that $\displaystyle \frac{x}{x-4}=1+\frac{4}{x-4}$.
For $x=7$, it is the same that $\displaystyle \frac{7}{7-4}=1+\frac{4}{7-4}$, just like any arbitrary $x$.
However, it just so happens that $\displaystyle 1+\frac{4}{7-4}$ can be rewritten as $\displaystyle 2+\frac{1}{7-4}$.
The polynomial remainder is still $4$.
On
Notice:
$7=4*3+(-5) $
$7=3*3+(-2) $
$7=2*3+1$
$7=1*3+4$
$7=0*3+7$
$7=-1*3+10$
Etc. So which one qualifies as "the" remainder? Why is it $1$? Whis it not $4$, $10$ or $-2$?
Well, because the remainder is defined to be at least $0$ but strictly less than the divisor.
The 1 is "the" remainder. The rest are congruences. And there are an infinite number of them.
So $\frac x {x-4}= 1 + \frac 4 {x-4} $. Or in other words $x=1*(x-4)+4$.
But is $4$ "the" remainder? Or is $4$ just a congruence?
The depends on whether $4 < x-4$ or not. If $x=7$ then $4> x-4$ and $4$ is not "the" remainder. It is a congruence.
In particular this is $7=1*3+4$.
... which is $7=1*3+3+1$ which is $7=(1+1)*3+1$ which is $7=2*3+1$
Note: we also have: $x = 2*(x-4)+(4-(x-4))=2*(x-4)+(8-x) $.
If we use that expression, then the remainder is $8-x$ which is $1$ for $x=7$.
Because the quotients are different:
$ 7 = 2 \cdot 3 + 1 $
$ x = 1 \cdot (x-4) + 4 $
When $x=7$ we get
$ 7 = 1 \cdot 3 + 4 $
which is correct, of course.