Let $V$ be a finite-dimensional representation of the simple Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$. We also give to the dual space $V^*$ of $V$ a structure of representation of $\mathfrak{g}$ by setting $(g \cdot f)(v) = -f(g \cdot v)$. How to prove that if $V$ is simple (resp. semi-simple) then $V^*$ is simple (resp. semi-simple) ?
2026-03-26 17:14:04.1774545244
Representation on the dual space of a simple representation
182 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GROUP-THEORY
- What is the intersection of the vertices of a face of a simplicial complex?
- Group with order $pq$ has subgroups of order $p$ and $q$
- How to construct a group whose "size" grows between polynomially and exponentially.
- Conjugacy class formula
- $G$ abelian when $Z(G)$ is a proper subset of $G$?
- A group of order 189 is not simple
- Minimal dimension needed for linearization of group action
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
- subgroups that contain a normal subgroup is also normal
- Could anyone give an **example** that a problem that can be solved by creating a new group?
Related Questions in REPRESENTATION-THEORY
- How does $\operatorname{Ind}^G_H$ behave with respect to $\bigoplus$?
- Minimal dimension needed for linearization of group action
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Assuming unitarity of arbitrary representations in proof of Schur's lemma
- Are representation isomorphisms of permutation representations necessarily permutation matrices?
- idempotent in quiver theory
- Help with a definition in Serre's Linear Representations of Finite Groups
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- Properties of symmetric and alternating characters
- Representation theory of $S_3$
Related Questions in LIE-ALGEBRAS
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Computing the logarithm of an exponentiated matrix?
- Need help with notation. Is this lower dot an operation?
- On uniparametric subgroups of a Lie group
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- $SU(2)$ adjoint and fundamental transformations
- Radical of Der(L) where L is a Lie Algebra
- $SU(3)$ irreps decomposition in subgroup irreps
- Given a representation $\phi: L \rightarrow \mathfrak {gl}(V)$ $\phi(L)$ in End $V$ leaves invariant precisely the same subspaces as $L$.
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
Related Questions in DUAL-SPACES
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- How to conclude that $\ell_\infty$ is not separable from this exercise?
- Dual of linear map into a tensor product
- Basis of vector spaces in perfect pairing
- How to find a dual basis given a basis?
- $T \in \mathcal L(V,W)$ is surjective $\iff ($range $T)^0 = \{0\}$
- Restrict $g$ to a dense subclass in $\|f\|_p=\text{sup}\{|\int_Xfg|:\|g\|_{p'}\leq 1\}$
- $(\text{Im}(T^*))^0 = \ker(T)$?
- Unit ball in dual space is weak*separable
- Co- and contravariance of vectors vs co- and contravariant functors
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Let $\langle -, - \rangle: V \times V^* \to \mathbb{C}$ represent the natural pairing between the original space and its dual, so that $\langle v, f \rangle = f(v)$. Note that by the definition of the action of $\mathfrak{g}$ on the dual space, we have the "skew-adjoint" property $$ \langle v, x \cdot f \rangle = (x \cdot f)(v) = - f(x \cdot v) = - \langle x \cdot v, f \rangle.$$
For any subspace $U \subseteq V$, we can define the annihilating subspace $$ U^\perp = \{ f \in V^* \mid \langle u, f \rangle = 0 \text{ for all } u \in U \} \subseteq V^*.$$ Now suppose that $U \subseteq V$ is a subrepresentation, so $x \cdot u \in U$ for all $x \in \mathfrak{g}$. Then we check that the complement space $U^\perp$ is also subrepresentation of $V^*$: for any $f \in U^\perp$ we have $$ 0 = \langle x \cdot u, f \rangle = - \langle u, x \cdot f \rangle$$ by the skew-adjoint property, showing that $x \cdot f \in U^\perp$. Hence $U^\perp$ is a subrepresentation.
Nondegeneracy of $\langle -, - \rangle$ implies that $\dim U^\perp = \dim V - \dim U$, and so we know that a nontrivial subrepresentation $U$ of $V$ gives a nontrivial subrepresentation $U^\perp$ of $V^*$. The converse also works (the proof is exactly the same), and hence $V$ is simple if and only if $V^*$ is. I'll leave it up to you to figure out how to prove that $V$ is semisimple if and only if $V^*$ is.