Let $G=G_1\times G_2$ be a product of two compact Lie groups. Is every finite dimensional irreducible representation of $G$ a tensor product of irreducible representations of $G_1$ and $G_2$? This seems to be true (at least in many cases) but I have been unable to find a reference. Could someone provide a reference or a proof for this?
2026-04-24 00:55:46.1776992146
Representations of a product of Lie groups
655 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REFERENCE-REQUEST
- Best book to study Lie group theory
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Transition from theory of PDEs to applied analysis and industrial problems and models with PDEs
- Random variables in integrals, how to analyze?
- Abstract Algebra Preparation
- Definition of matrix valued smooth function
- CLT for Martingales
- Almost locality of cubic spline interpolation
- Identify sequences from OEIS or the literature, or find examples of odd integers $n\geq 1$ satisfying these equations related to odd perfect numbers
- property of Lebesgue measure involving small intervals
Related Questions in REPRESENTATION-THEORY
- How does $\operatorname{Ind}^G_H$ behave with respect to $\bigoplus$?
- Minimal dimension needed for linearization of group action
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Assuming unitarity of arbitrary representations in proof of Schur's lemma
- Are representation isomorphisms of permutation representations necessarily permutation matrices?
- idempotent in quiver theory
- Help with a definition in Serre's Linear Representations of Finite Groups
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- Properties of symmetric and alternating characters
- Representation theory of $S_3$
Related Questions in LIE-GROUPS
- Best book to study Lie group theory
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- homomorphism between unitary groups
- On uniparametric subgroups of a Lie group
- Is it true that if a Lie group act trivially on an open subset of a manifold the action of the group is trivial (on the whole manifold)?
- Find non-zero real numbers $a,b,c,d$ such that $a^2+c^2=b^2+d^2$ and $ab+cd=0$.
- $SU(2)$ adjoint and fundamental transformations
- A finite group G acts freely on a simply connected manifold M
- $SU(3)$ irreps decomposition in subgroup irreps
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
This is a consequence of the Peter-Weyl theorem, which says that the components $\phi_{ij}$ of the irreducible representations $\phi$ of $G_1$ form an orthogonal basis for $L^2(G_1)$, and similarly the components $\psi_{ij}$ of the irreducible representations $\psi$ of $G_2$ form an orthogonal basis for $L^2(G_2)$. The components of the tensor product $\theta=\phi \otimes \psi$ have the form $\theta_{ijkl}(g_1,g_2)=\phi_{ij}(g_1)\psi_{kl}(g_2)$. A straightforward computation shows that $\langle \chi_{\theta}, \chi_{\theta'} \rangle$ equals 1 if $\theta=\theta'$ and is zero otherwise. This shows that the tensor products $\theta=\phi \otimes \psi$ are distinct irreducible representations of $G$, as $\phi$ and $\psi$ range over the irreducible representations of $G_1$ and $G_2$. Thus the components $\theta_{ijkl}$ form an orthogonal set in $L^2(G)$.
By the completeness of $\phi_{ij}$ and $\psi_{ij}$ in $L^2(G_1)$ and $L^2(G_2)$ respectively, any indicator function (i.e., characteristic function) $1_{A}$ on a Borel-measurable subset $A \subseteq G_1$ may be well-approximated (in the $L^2$ norm) by a finite linear combination of the $\phi_{ij}$, and likewise an indicator function $1_{B}$ on a Borel-measurable subset $B \subseteq G_2$ may be well-approximated by a finite linear combination of the $\psi_{ij}$. It follows that $1_{A\times B}(g_1,g_2)=1_A(g_1)1_B(g_2)$ may be well approximated by a finite linear combination of the functions $\phi_{ij}(g_1)\psi_{kl}(g_2)$, i.e. by the $\theta_{ijkl}$. Since the linear combinations of $1_{A\times B}$ are dense in $L^2(G)$, this shows that the $\theta_{ijkl}$, when suitably normalized, form a complete orthonormal set in $L^2(G)$. Any other irreducible representation of $G_1 \times G_2$ would have to be orthogonal to all the $\theta_{ijkl}$ (by again applying Peter-Weyl), but the completeness of $\theta_{ijkl}$ rules this possibility out. This proves that all irreducible representations of $G= G_1 \times G_2$ are of the form $\phi \otimes \psi$ for irreducible representation $\phi$ of $G_1$ and $\psi$ of $G_2$.