Let $X$ be a Banach space and $A:D(A)\to X$ be an unbounded linear operator such that for all $\lambda>c$ ($c$ some constant), $(\lambda I-A)^{-1}$ exists and is a bounded operator which satisfies: $$\|(\lambda I-A)^{-n}\|\leq\frac{M}{(\lambda-c)^n}, \ \forall n\geq 1 \text{ and } \lambda>c.$$ Now consider the operator $B:D(B)\to X$ defined by $$D(B)=\{x\in D(A), \ \ Au\in \overline{D(A)} \},$$ and $$Bx=Ax, \ \ \forall x\in D(B).$$ How can we show that $\overline{D(B)}=\overline{D(A)}$ ? Do we need to assume that $A$ is closed (graph closed) ?
2026-03-31 17:33:07.1774978387
Restriction of an operator on a Banach space
174 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
Related Questions in OPERATOR-THEORY
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Confusion about relationship between operator $K$-theory and topological $K$-theory
- Definition of matrix valued smooth function
- hyponormal operators
- a positive matrix of operators
- If $S=(S_1,S_2)$ hyponormal, why $S_1$ and $S_2$ are hyponormal?
- Closed kernel of a operator.
- Why is $\lambda\mapsto(\lambda\textbf{1}-T)^{-1}$ analytic on $\rho(T)$?
- Show that a sequence of operators converges strongly to $I$ but not by norm.
- Is the dot product a symmetric or anti-symmetric operator?
Related Questions in BANACH-SPACES
- Problem 1.70 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Is the cartesian product of two Hilbert spaces a Hilbert space?
- Why is $\lambda\mapsto(\lambda\textbf{1}-T)^{-1}$ analytic on $\rho(T)$?
- Is ${C}[0,1],\Bbb{R}$ homeomorphic to any $\Bbb{R^n}$, for an integer $n$?
- Identify $\operatorname{co}(\{e_n:n\in\mathbb N\})$ and $\overline{\operatorname{co}}(\{e_n : n\in\mathbb N\})$ in $c_0$ and $\ell^p$
- Theorem 1.7.9 of Megginson: Completeness is a three-space property.
- A weakly open subset of the unit ball of the Read's space $R$ (an infinite-dimensional Banach space) is unbounded.
- Separability of differentiable functions
- Showing $u_{\lambda}(x):= \left(\frac{\lambda}{{\lambda}^{2}+|x|^2}\right)^{\frac{n-2}{2}}$ is not sequentially compact in $L^{2^{*}}$
- Proving that a composition of bounded operator and trace class operator is trace class
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Assume that $(A-\lambda I)^{-1}$ is defined on all of $X$ and is bounded. Then $(A-\lambda I)^{-1}$ is closed. The graph of $A-\lambda I$ and the graph of $(A-\lambda I)^{-1}$ are transposes of each other in $X\times X$, which guarantees that $A$ is closed. So you can deduce that $A$ is closed under those circumstances.
You can also deduce that the domain of $A^{n}$ must be dense $\overline{\mathcal{D}(A)}$. This follows from showing that $$ \lim_{\lambda\rightarrow\infty}\lambda^{n}(\lambda I-A)^{-n}x = x, \;\;\; x \in \overline{\mathcal{D}(A)}. $$ Start with $n=1$. If $x \in \mathcal{D}(A)$, then $$ \lambda (\lambda I-A)^{-1}x=(\lambda I-A)^{-1}(\lambda I-A+A)x=x+(\lambda I-A)^{-1}Ax, $$ which implies $$ \|\lambda(\lambda I-A)^{-1}x-x\| \le \|(\lambda I-A)^{-1}Ax\| \le \frac{M}{\lambda -c}\|Ax\|\rightarrow 0\;\; \mbox{ as }\; \lambda \rightarrow \infty. $$ For a general $y \in \overline{\mathcal{D}(A)}$, and $x \in \mathcal{D}(A)$, $$ \begin{align} \|\lambda(\lambda I-A)^{-1}y-y\| & \le \|\lambda(\lambda I-A)^{-1}(y-x)-(y-x)\|+ \|\lambda(\lambda I-A)^{-1}x-x\| \\ &\le \left[\frac{M}{\lambda -c}+1\right]\|y-x\|+\|\lambda(\lambda I-A)^{-1}x-x\|. \end{align} $$ The right side can be made arbitrarily small because (a) $\mathcal{D}(A)$ is dense in $\overline{\mathcal{D}(A)}$ and (b) $\lim_{\lambda\rightarrow\infty}\|\lambda(\lambda I-A)^{-1}x-x\|=0$ for all $x \in \mathcal{D}(A)$. So the stated result holds for $n=1$. For $n > 1$, finish by writing $$ \begin{align} \|(\lambda(\lambda I-A)^{-1})^{n}x-x\| & \le \sum_{k=1}^{n}\|(\lambda(\lambda I-A)^{-1})^{k}x-(\lambda(\lambda I-A)^{-1})^{k-1}x\| \\ & \le \left[\sum_{k=1}^{n}\|\lambda(\lambda I-A)^{-1}\|^{k-1}\right]\|\lambda(\lambda I-A)^{-1}x-x\|. \end{align} $$