Roots of transcendent equations $\tan{x}=bx$ and $x\tan{x}=b$

1.7k Views Asked by At

We know that transcendent equations $$\tan{x}=bx$$ and $$x\tan{x}=b$$ can not be solved exactly. But what I concerned most is the relationship between their non-trival roots $x_{n}^{(1)}$ and $x_{n}^{(2)}$, where $x_{n}^{(1)}$ and $x_{n}^{(2)}$ refer to the $n$-th positive solution to the first and second of these equations respectively. For example $x_{n}^{(1)}=x_{n}^{(2)}+\pi/2$( which is incorrect). Any suggestions?

Similar question is the roots of $W(x)\exp(W(x))=x$ and $M(x)\ln(M(x))=x$.

3

There are 3 best solutions below

12
On BEST ANSWER

In the particular case $b=1$, it is known that the roots of $\tan(x_n)=x_n$ are close to : $x_n=(n-\frac{1}{2})\pi-\frac{1}{(n-\frac{1}{2})\pi}-\frac{2}{3}(\frac{1}{(n-\frac{1}{2})\pi})^3-\frac{13}{15}(\frac{1}{(n-\frac{1}{2})\pi})^5-\frac{146}{105}(\frac{1}{(n-\frac{1}{2})\pi})^7-\frac{781}{315}(\frac{1}{(n-\frac{1}{2})\pi})^9-...$

The trivial root $x=0$ is not included in the list. The first positive root $x_1$ is not accurate. The accuracy increasses quickly for larger $\vert n \vert$. The first negative root is denoted $x_0$ ( not accurate) and the next negative roots correspond to $n<0$ so that $x_{-n}=-x_{n+1}$

With the same method of series expansion, I got the roots of $\tan(x_n)=b x_n$ :

$x_n=(n-\frac{1}{2})\pi-\frac{1}{b}\frac{1}{(n-\frac{1}{2})\pi}-\frac{3b-1}{3b^3}(\frac{1}{(n-\frac{1}{2})\pi})^3-\frac{30b^2-20b+3}{15b^5}(\frac{1}{(n-\frac{1}{2})\pi})^5$ $-\frac{525b^3-252b^2+161b-15}{105b^7}(\frac{1}{(n-\frac{1}{2})\pi})^7-\frac{4410b^4-5880b^3+2744b^2-528b+35}{315b^9}(\frac{1}{(n-\frac{1}{2})\pi})^9-...$

and the roots of $x_n \tan(x_n)=b$ with $n>1$ :

$x_n=(n-1)\pi+\frac{b}{(n-1)\pi}-\frac{b^2(b+3)}{3}(\frac{1}{(n-1)\pi})^3+\frac{b^3(3b^2+20b+30)}{15}(\frac{1}{(n-1)\pi})^5$ $-\frac{b^4(15b^3+161b^2+525b+525)}{105}(\frac{1}{(n-1)\pi})^7+\frac{b^5(35b^4+528b^3+2744b^2+5880b+4410)}{315}(\frac{1}{(n-1)\pi})^9-...$

Case $n=1$ : The serie is not convergent for the first root $(n=1)$ because $x_1$ is equivalent to $\sqrt{b}$ when $x$ tends to $0$. So, the serie cannot be expressed in terms of integer powers of $b$ as it was above. An approximate for the first root is :

$x_1=\sqrt b \big( 1-\frac{1}{6}b+ \frac{11}{360}b^2- \frac{17}{5040}b^3- \frac{281}{604800}b^4+ \frac{44029}{119750400}b^5- \frac{12147139}{130767436800}b^6$ $+ \frac{2030761}{784604620800}b^7+ \frac{1381516351}{313841848320000}b^8+…\big)$

This serie is slowly convergent. So, a large number of terms are required if $b$ is not small.

0
On

When the roots are close to $P_n=(n+\frac12)\pi$, we can approximate the tangent as $$\tan(P_n+h)\approx-\frac1h,$$ and the equations become $$-\frac1h=b(P_n+h),$$ $$-\frac1{h'}(P_{n'}+h')=b.$$ Eliminating $b$, this gives the equation of a cubic $$-\frac1h=-\frac1{h'}(P_{n'}+h')(P_n+h),$$ $$h'=h(P_{n'}+h')(P_n+h).$$ For large $n$ and $n'$, it simplifies to $$h'=hP_{n'}P_n,$$ so that $$\frac{x_n^{(2)}-P_n}{x_n^{(1)}-P_n}\approx P_n^2.$$ Nothing really exciting as this is just an approximation. But my guess is that if a simple relation between the roots had existed, the linearized analysis would have revealed it.

0
On

In this article you can find the exact solutions of both your equations using an extension of Riemann method http://www4.ncsu.edu/~ces/pdfversions/52.pdf