"Find x for 0≤x≤100,000."
My clues are as following. I'm not sure whether there are multiple answers or that only one 'x' remains based on these clues:
This number isn’t between 20,000 and 40,000 or 60,000 and 80,000.
This number is divisible by three values between 10 and 50.
The sum of the prime factors of this number is 53. (20 would be 2+2+5=9).
Digits multiply up to 0. (So one of the digits is 0)
This number is odd.
Concerning the 2nd statement, it says that the number is divisible by three values between 10 and 50. But is it exactly 3 values?
If not, then to date I found 3 such numbers exist,namely $5083$, $4807$ and $85085$.
For $5083$,
1st statement is valid as $0<5083<20000$
2nd statement is valid as $5083=13\cdot17\cdot23$
3rd statement is valid as $13+17+23=53$
4th statement is valid as $5\cdot0\cdot8\cdot3=0$
5th statement is valid as $5083$ is odd.
And similiar for $4807$
Similiar for $85085$,
2nd statement is valid as $85085=5\cdot7\cdot11\cdot13\cdot17$ (if more than 3 prime factors are allowed)
3rd statement is valid as $5+7+11+13+17=53$
For statement 1,4,5, you can easily see that their validity.
Methodology
As what I've typed in the comment section, that the sum of prime number is 53 have those combinations mentioned. Among the 3-prime-factor-sum, only 3 of them can constitute 3 factors which is between 10 and 50. They are $(11,13,29)(11,19,23)(13,17,23)$. And their product are $4147,4807$ and $5083$ respectively. And $4147$ is not the answer as it doesn't have a "0".
Among the 4-prime-factor-sum, one can discover all these combinations consist of a "2". But then products of these prime factors,that are, the number to be found, are even, and not odd, so they are excluded from consideration. Fortunately, for the combination $(5,7,11,13,17)$ does not consist of a "2" and can fit all the requirements.