Seeking general methods to attack $ax^4+bx^3y+cx^2y^2+dxy^3+ey^4=z^2$ in integers/rationals

261 Views Asked by At

In my current number theory work, I'm running into many equations of the form in the title.

Q1: Am I correct in calling this a quartic Thue equation?

Q2: Are there general methods to attacking this special case where the constant is the square $z^2$? In particular, are there any powerful elementary methods?

Q3: What are the best general references/links regarding this equation?

Example: One equation that I'm currently trying to solve is $$x^4-18x^2y^2+40xy^3-27y^4=z^2.$$ (In fact, in many of the equations I am running into, $b=0$ or $d=0$.) I am trying to prove that the only primitive solution in positive integers is $(x,y,z)=(27,10,171)$.

2

There are 2 best solutions below

4
On BEST ANSWER

These are only termed quartic Thue equations if the values of $z$ is fixed. As noted above, if there is a rational point, then such an equation defines an elliptic curve; these are much studied but, as far as I am aware, there are no particularly useful elementary approaches that lead to reasonable understanding of their rational points in general. Books by Cassels and Silverman are very useful here.

For your example, it is easy to show that it is isomorphic over $\mathbb{Q}$ to Cremona's 1728v1, which has rank $1$ and no nontrivial torsion. It follows that your solution is one of infinitely many (in fact, it corresponds to the generator on the curve). Doubling this point and mapping it back to your quartic model yields the next solution : $$ x=5383, \; y=1710, \; z=12660211. $$

4
On

M. Bennett gave a good answer, but if you want an elementary method, then here is one. Given,

$$ax^4+bx^3y+cx^2y^2+dxy^3+ey^4=z^2\tag1$$

Since the polynomial is homogeneous, let $x=py$ to express it in the simpler form,

$$ap^4+bp^3+cp^2+dp+e = z^2\tag2$$

with your case as,

$$\color{blue}{p^4 - 18p^2 + 40p - 27 = z^2}\tag3$$

Step 1. Finding an initial solution

If $a$ is a square, then divide all coefficients by it. If you are in luck and your leading coefficient is already $a=1$, then an initial solution can easily be attained. It is given by,

$$p = \frac{(b^2 - 4 c)^2 - 64 e}{8 b(b^2 - 4 c) + 64 d}\tag4$$

The formula yields $\color{blue}{p_1=\frac{27}{10}}$ which you have already found.

Step 2. Finding other solutions

What you want is to make the constant term of $(3)$ as a square. Do the substitution $p=q+\frac{27}{10}$ on $(3)$ to get,

$$q^4+\tfrac{54}{5}q^3+\tfrac{1287}{50}q^2+\tfrac{5383}{250}q+\color{red}{\big(\tfrac{171}{100})^2}=z^2\tag5$$

or, in general,

$$aq^4+bq^3+cq^2+dq+\color{red}{r^2}=z^2\tag6$$

which can now be solved.

a) First way:

If $a=1$, then,

$$q_1 = \frac{(b^2 - 4c)^2 - 64r^2}{8b(b^2 - 4c) + 64d}\tag7$$

$$q_2 = \frac{4 (-b r + d)}{b^2 - 4 c + 8 r}\tag8$$

$$q_3 = -\frac{(d^2 - 4 c r^2) + 8 r^3}{4 r (-b r + d)}\tag9$$

Using $(5)$, then $q_i = 0,\;\frac{383}{855},\;-\frac{12660211}{1309860}$, respectively. Since $p=q+\frac{27}{10}$, then,

$$\color{blue}{p_1 =\tfrac{27}{10},\; p_2 = \tfrac{5383}{1710},\;p_3 =-\tfrac{9123589}{1309860}}$$

the first you know, and the second mentioned by Bennett. Thus, if your original equation was square at both ends like $(5)$, then generally you can quickly find three solutions. (Though some coefficients yield $q_1 = q_2 = q_3$, or something similar.)

b) Second way:

For general $a$, then another solution is,

$$q_4=\frac{8 d r^2(d^2 - 4 c r^2) + 64 b r^6}{(d^2 - 4 c r^2)^2 - 64 a r^6}\tag{10}$$

Using $(5)$, then $q_4=\frac{387354562047}{96977216260}$ which yields $\color{blue}{p_4 =\frac{649193045949}{96977216260}}$.

Step 3. Finding more solutions

Simply repeat Step 2, but use the second value $p_2$,

$$p=q+\tfrac{5383}{1710}$$

which should give a third, then a fourth, etc. Do likewise for all $p_i$, and so on.

Disclaimer:. This tangent method, known way back to Fermat, is easy to understand and you can use it to prove that your initial $x,y$ are not the only ones. However, it is not perfect. It usually misses smaller points, and there are variables such that it will just yield $q_1 = q_2$. The method has been subsumed by the study of elliptic curves which give a thorough treatment of the subject.