Forgive the possibly naive question, but I'm returning to a basic undergrad-level study of chaotic dynamical systems and can't quite seem to reconcile the notion that in order for a dynamical system to be considered chaotic, it must have positive global Lyapunov exponents. Such exponents, of course, drive the divergence of trajectories. However, topological transitivity implies that trajectories can get arbitrarily close as well over some finite time. It seems that positive Lyapunov exponents would disallow this mixing. Is there a point at which these positive exponents no longer describe the system, and the mixing behavior begins?
2026-03-26 08:15:22.1774512922
Sensitivity to initial conditions and topological transitivity
516 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DYNAMICAL-SYSTEMS
- Stability of system of parameters $\kappa, \lambda$ when there is a zero eigenvalue
- Stability of stationary point $O(0,0)$ when eigenvalues are zero
- Determine $ \ a_{\max} \ $ and $ \ a_{\min} \ $ so that the above difference equation is well-defined.
- Question on designing a state observer for discrete time system
- How to analyze a dynamical system when $t\to\infty?$
- The system $x' = h(y), \space y' = ay + g(x)$ has no periodic solutions
- Existence of unique limit cycle for $r'=r(μ-r^2), \space θ' = ρ(r^2)$
- Including a time delay term for a differential equation
- Doubts in proof of topologically transitive + dense periodic points = Devaney Chaotic
- Condition for symmetric part of $A$ for $\|x(t)\|$ monotonically decreasing ($\dot{x} = Ax(t)$)
Related Questions in CHAOS-THEORY
- Chaotic behaviour from iteration process.
- Doubts in proof of topologically transitive + dense periodic points = Devaney Chaotic
- Homeomorphism between Smale set and $\{0,2\} ^{\mathbb{Z}}$
- Making something a control parameter or a variable when analysing a dynamical system
- Lorenz attractor as a position-velocity-acceleration problem
- Do chaos and/or limit cycles always require the existence of an unstable fixed point?
- Is the "sensitive dependence on initial conditions" of chaotic systems referring to the seed, control parameters, or both?
- Logistic map and chaos on a Cantor set
- Moser invariant curves in discrete dynamical systems and how they give stability
- Why do we need folding and a finite domain for chaos?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Yes. The exponential divergence described by the Lyapunov exponents only affects trajectories whose separation is sufficiently close. Also, it only holds on average. For example, you can define the largest Lyapunov exponents as follows:
$$ λ_1 := \lim_{τ→∞} \; \lim_{|x(t)-y(t)|→0}\; \frac{1}{τ} \ln\left(\frac{|x(t+τ)-y(t+τ)|}{|x(t)-y(t)|}\right) $$
where $x$ and $y$ are two trajectories of your dynamics. Here, the limit $|x(t)-y(t)|→0$ ensures that you only consider the separation of infinitesimally close trajectories. (Also, see this question on Physics.)
Once the separation of trajectories becomes too large, it is not exponentially growing but governed by the large-scale dynamics of the system. It then has some value that is of the order of magnitude of the size of the attractor (or invariant set) of your dynamics. E.g., here is the temporal evolution of two trajectories of the Lorenz system (attractor diameter $\approx 30$) starting off close by:
Now, you can see, that once the separation has reached the order of the magnitude of the attractor, it occasionally shrinks again (growing roughly exponentially afterwards). So the trajectories can come close to each other again. This happens along a direction corresponding to a negative Lyapunov exponent. This direction is orthogonal to the direction of largest separation which causes the positive Lyapunov exponents. This shrinking can be arbitrarily small and is the backbone of the topological transitivity.