Let $a, b, c, d$ positive integer, every two relatively coprime. Then the set $\lbrace gcd( an +b, cn + d)| n \in \mathbb{N} \rbrace$ is the set of the divisors of an natural number. I saw that the set is finite, but I don't know how to characterize the conclusion.
2026-04-12 23:11:30.1776035490
Set of divisors
165 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in NUMBER-THEORY
- Maximum number of guaranteed coins to get in a "30 coins in 3 boxes" puzzle
- Interesting number theoretical game
- Show that $(x,y,z)$ is a primitive Pythagorean triple then either $x$ or $y$ is divisible by $3$.
- About polynomial value being perfect power.
- Name of Theorem for Coloring of $\{1, \dots, n\}$
- Reciprocal-totient function, in term of the totient function?
- What is the smallest integer $N>2$, such that $x^5+y^5 = N$ has a rational solution?
- Integer from base 10 to base 2
- How do I show that any natural number of this expression is a natural linear combination?
- Counting the number of solutions of the congruence $x^k\equiv h$ (mod q)
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
If $k\ | \ an + b$ and $k \ | \ cn + d$, then $k \ | \ c(an+b) - a(cn+d) = bc - ad$. Therefore every element in your set must divide $\Delta = |bc - ad|$.
For the converse statement, you need to show that every positive divisor of $\Delta$ is in the set. Without loss of generality let $ad - bc > 0$.
On the Cartesian plane the vectors $(a, c)$ and $(b, d)$ form a parallelogram with area $\Delta$. As $a, b, c, d$ are pairwise relatively prime, the edges parallelogram does not have any integral points except for the vertices.
Fact 1: There are $\Delta - 1$ integral points lying in the parallelogram.
Fact 2: The $\Delta - 1$ integral points lying in the parallelogram have pairwise distinct distance to the segment $\overline{AC}$, where $C = (a, c)$.
Fact 2 is true because again $a, b, c, d$ are pairwise relatively prime.
Now we can label the interior integral points as $A_1, \cdots, A_{\Delta-1}$ based on the distance to the segment $\overline{AC}$ ($A_1$ is the closest). Denote the coordinate of $A_i = (x_i, y_i)$. Now, let $f \ | \ \Delta$.
Fact 3: $$ \frac{\Delta}{f} A_f = m_f (a, c) + (b,d) \quad\mbox{for some $m_f \in \mathbb N$}. $$
Therefore, if $\gcd(x_f, y_f) = 1$, we can immediately conclude that $\gcd(m_fa+b, m_fc+d) = \frac\Delta f$. If this is not the case, you need to "twist" $(x_f, y_f)$ into some $A_f' = (x_f, y_f) + m(a, c)$ for some $m$ so that the $x$ and $y$-coordinate are coprime. This is possible because $a$ and $c$ are coprime.
Example: We will illustrate this by an example $(a, b, c, d) = (5, 1, 3, 7)$. $\Delta = 32$, and the parallelogram is as follows:
$A_1 = (3,2)$ (the closest point to the segment $\overline{AC}$). So $32A_1 = (96, 64) = 19(5,3) + (1,7)$.
$A_2 = (1,1)$. So $16A_2 = (16,16) = 3(5,3) + (1,7)$.
$A_4 = (2,2)$. Since the coordinates are not coprime we twist it to $A_4' = A_4 + (5,3) = (7,5)$. So $8A_4' = (56,40) = 11(5,3) + (1,7)$.
$A_8 = (4,4)$. Since the coordinates are not coprime we twist it to $A_8' = A_8 + (5,3) = (9,7)$. So $4A_4' = (36,28) = 7(5,3) + (1,7)$.
$A_{16} = (3,5)$. So $2A_{16} = (6,10) = 1(5,3) + (1,7)$.
Remark: If you know some group theory, the black magic behind this is that $\Lambda = \mathbb Z(a,c) + \mathbb Z(b,d) \subseteq \mathbb Z^2$ defines a subgroup of $(\mathbb Z^2, +)$. The key fact is that while $a,b,c,d$ are pairwise relatively prime, The quotient group $\mathbb Z^2/\Lambda$ is cyclic of order $\Delta$. The point $A_1$ is merely a careful choice of the generator of the quotient subgroup.