Should "not P" be interpreted as "P implies a contradiction"?

344 Views Asked by At

From this answer,

(...) "not P" should be interpreted as the assertion "P implies a contradiction".

Is this the (only/widespread/mainly) accepted definition of the negation of a statement? For me, it definitely makes sense, as a false statement ultimately leads to the negation of an axiom.

1

There are 1 best solutions below

1
On

Well, $P$ is logically equivalent to $\neg P\Rightarrow\text{false}$ and is the basis of the proof of contradictio. This coincides with your observation.