Show for closed terms $t$ and formulas $\phi$. Given a structure $M$: $$ \begin{align} M&\vDash t = \overline{t}\,^M\\ M&\vDash \phi(t) \leftrightarrow \phi(\overline{t}\,^M) \end{align} $$
For the first statement, we can say that any interpretation of a closed term is the same term, so the valuation of this atomic formula gives always $1$. The other part is not than clear, because we see a formula, not necessary a sentence, so, the valuation ($1- |(\phi(t))^M -\phi(\overline{t}\,^M)|$) must be $1$. I' not sure what is the next step. How do you prove that?
Comment
not exactly.
If $t$ is a (closed) term of the language, then $t^{\mathcal M}$ is its interpretation in the structure $\mathcal M$ while $\overline {(t^{\mathcal M})}$ is the "added" constant symbol for $t^{\mathcal M} \in |\mathcal M|$ [see page 65].
Example from the language for f-o arithmetic [see Exercise 1, page 68], i.e. for the structure :
A closed term is e.g. :
if we call it $t$, then $t^{\mathcal N}$ is the number $2$, while the "added" constant symbol $\overline {(t^{\mathcal N})}$ is $\overline 2$.
Thus, applying clause 2 of Definition 3.4.2, we have to prove that:
and this is so if:
which is "convoluted" but obvious: the "added" constant symbol $\overline {(t^{\mathcal M})}$ is the "name" for the object associated in the interpretation to the term $t$. Thus $\overline {(t^{\mathcal M})}^{\mathcal M}$ is the object itself.
But the object associated in the interpretation to the term $t$ is $t^{\mathcal M}$.
Regarding the formula $\varphi(t)$, it is closed and thus a sentence; so, we can apply Lemma 3.4.5 (v).