there is an example of how we apply Integral test for convergence
Theorem: Consider an $n_{0}$ and a non-negative, continuous function $f$ defined on the unbounded $[n_0,+\infty[$, on which it is monotone decreasing. Then $\forall (p,q)\in\mathbb{N}^{2}$ such that $n_o\leq p <q$: $${\displaystyle \int _{p+1}^{q+1 }f(x)\,dx\leq \sum _{k=p+1}^{q }f(k)\leq \int _{p}^{q }f(x)\,dx}$$
i don't understand why they took the bounded from $1$ to $n+1$ instead of $n \geq 2,\ 1=n_0=p,\ q=n$
$$\displaystyle \int_{1+1}^{n+1}\dfrac{1}{x}dx\leq \sum_{k=1+1}^{n}\dfrac{1}{k}\leq \int_{1}^{n}\dfrac{1}{x}dx$$


The value of $p$ is different for each of the inequalities.
The second of these points yields $$\sum_{k=1}^n \frac{1}{k} = 1 + \sum_{k=2}^n \frac{1}{k} \le 1 + \int_1^n \frac{1}{x}\, dx = 1 + \ln(n)$$
You could have done it the way that you suggest, but that would have yielded $$\ln(n+1)-\ln 2 \le \sum_{k=2}^n \frac{1}{k} \le \ln(n)$$ and hence $$\ln(n+1)-\ln(2)+1 \le \sum_{k=1}^n \frac{1}{k} \le \ln(n)+1$$ and you ultimately end up with the same result, since $$\ln(n+1)-\ln(2)+1 \sim \ln(n) \text{ and } \ln(n)+1 \sim \ln(n) \text{ as } n \to \infty$$