Show that $2n^2+11$ and $2n^2+29$ generate primes for all non-negative integers $n<11$ and $n<29$ respectively.
This question is from Elementary Number Theory by Kenneth Rosen. The book's solution has used a brute force method to generate all numbers and manually check if they are prime or not.
I wish to ask instead if there is a better method. I have looked around on the internet and couldn't find anything. I instead wrote a C program to test the theory about primes of the form $2n^2+x$ $(0\leq n<x)$, and it seems only $x=3,5,11,29$ satisfy it under $10^6$.
So, is there no better, more number theoretical way to verify the given question?
Context: here is a proof for the better-known $n^2 + n + 41$ Is the notorious $n^2 + n + 41$ prime generator the last of its type?
Took me a while and some numerical experiments, but I got this one. For foundational material on positive binary quadratic forms, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_quadratic_form and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_quadratic_form#References My favorite book is Buell; people seem to like Cox.
We are given a prime $p \equiv \pm 3 \pmod 8$ such that the form class number $h(-8p) = 2.$ In particular, the only classes are those of $$ x^2 + 2py^2 $$ and $$ 2 x^2 + p y^2. $$ The shorthand for these two forms is $\langle 1,0,2p \rangle$ and $\langle 2,0,p \rangle \; . \;$
Note that the product $2p$ must be one of Euler's Idoneal Numbers
We will ASSUME that there is an integer $n$ with $1 \leq n < p$ such that $2n^2 + p$ is composite. We will show that this leads o a contradiction by constructing a third primitive quadratic form of the same discriminant.
Let $q$ be the smallest prime that divides any $2n^2 + p$ with $n < p.$ Usually there will be several small $n$ giving the same $q.$ In turn, take the smallest $n$ that works, meaning $2n^2 + p \equiv 0 \pmod q \; . \;$ We get $q$ prime, $$ 2n^2 + p = q t \; , \; $$ $$ t > q > 2n \; . \; $$
There are just two cases.
IF $q > 4 n,$ then $$ \langle q,4n,2t \rangle $$ is a reduced primitive form of the same discriminant $(-8p).$ It is not equivalent to either of the original forms listed, that is what we get for reduced forms.
IF $q < 4 n,$ then $$ \langle q,4n-2q, 2t - 4n + q \rangle $$ is a reduced primitive form of the same discriminant $(-8p).$
In either case, the presence of composite numbers represented as $2n^2 + p$ has resulted in $h(-8p) \geq 3,$ contradicting the hypothesis of class number 2.
Examples for the first case:
If $p \equiv 3 \pmod 5,$ we can take $n=1$ and get third form $$ \langle 5,4, \frac{2p+4}{5} \rangle $$
If $p \equiv 3 \pmod {11},$ we can take $n=2$ and get third form $$ \langle 11,8, \frac{2p+16}{11} \rangle $$
Examples for the second case:
If $p \equiv 1 \pmod 3,$ we can take $n=1$ and get third form $$ \langle 3,2, \frac{2p+1}{3} \rangle $$ If $p \equiv 2 \pmod 5,$ we can take $n=2$ and get third form $$ \langle 5,2, \frac{2p+1}{5} \rangle $$