How can it be proved? In a way which could be understood by a undergraduate math student. Specially if and "only if".
2026-03-30 14:25:18.1774880718
Show that any convex subset of a Banach space X is closed with respect to the norm if and only if it is closed in the weak topology
140 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
Related Questions in BANACH-SPACES
- Problem 1.70 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Is the cartesian product of two Hilbert spaces a Hilbert space?
- Why is $\lambda\mapsto(\lambda\textbf{1}-T)^{-1}$ analytic on $\rho(T)$?
- Is ${C}[0,1],\Bbb{R}$ homeomorphic to any $\Bbb{R^n}$, for an integer $n$?
- Identify $\operatorname{co}(\{e_n:n\in\mathbb N\})$ and $\overline{\operatorname{co}}(\{e_n : n\in\mathbb N\})$ in $c_0$ and $\ell^p$
- Theorem 1.7.9 of Megginson: Completeness is a three-space property.
- A weakly open subset of the unit ball of the Read's space $R$ (an infinite-dimensional Banach space) is unbounded.
- Separability of differentiable functions
- Showing $u_{\lambda}(x):= \left(\frac{\lambda}{{\lambda}^{2}+|x|^2}\right)^{\frac{n-2}{2}}$ is not sequentially compact in $L^{2^{*}}$
- Proving that a composition of bounded operator and trace class operator is trace class
Related Questions in TOPOLOGICAL-VECTOR-SPACES
- Countable dense subset of functions of exponential type 1 that decay along the positive real axis
- Let $X$ be a topological vector space. Then how you show $A^\perp$ is closed in $X^*$ under the strong topology?
- Box topology defines a topological vector space?
- Are there analogues to orthogonal transformations in non-orientable surfaces?
- Is Hilbert space a Normed Space or a Inner Product Space? Or it have to be both at the same time?
- Are most linear operators invertible?
- The finest locally convex topology is not metrizable
- Non-Hausdorff topology on the germs of holomorphic functions
- Topological isomorphism between $C^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}) = \lim_{\leftarrow}{C^{k}([-k, k])}$
- Can a linear subspace in Banach space be the union of several other subspaces?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
In the sequel, $E$ is our Banach space and $E'$ its dual. I consider $E$ a real vector space. The "strong" topology is the one induced by some fixed norm $\Vert\cdot\Vert$.
The "if" part:
Let's denote $B_{w}:=B(a,u_{1},\dots,u_{n},R):=\left\{x\in E\,\vert\,|u_{i}(x-a)|<R,\,i=1,\dots,n\right\}$ where $R>0$, $u_{i}\in E'$ and $a\in E$ (for some $n\in\mathbb{N}\setminus\{0,1\}$). The weak topology on $E$ is defined by
$$\mathcal{T}_{w}(E):=\left\{A\,\vert\,A=\cup B_{w}\right\}$$
(in other words, $A$ is open if $A$ is a union of some $B_{w}$). One can prove that it is indeed a topology.
Let $x$ be in $B(a,u_{1},\dots,u_{n},R)$ and $y\in E$ such that $\Vert x-y\Vert<\epsilon$. We want to prove that there exists such an epsilon $\epsilon$ such that $y\in B(a,u_{1},\dots,u_{n},R)$. In other words, we want to prove that any (strongly) open ball is contained in some $B_{w}$. By triangular inequality and by linearity of $u_{i}$ for all $i=1,\dots,n$, we have $$|u_{i}(y-a)|\le \underbrace{|u_{i}(x-a)|}_{<R-\delta}+|u_{i}(y-x)|$$ for some $\delta>0$. We have
$$|u_{i}(y-x)|\le\Vert u_{i}\Vert_{\text{op}}\cdot\Vert y-x\Vert<\Vert u_{i}\Vert\epsilon<\delta$$ for some suitable $\epsilon$, e.g. $\epsilon=\frac{\delta}{2u}$ where $u:=\max\left\{\Vert u_{i}\Vert_{\text{op}}\,\vert\,i=1,\dots,n\right\}$. Then, we have
$$|u_{i}(y-a)|<R-\delta+\delta=R$$
for any $i=1,\dots,n$. The "strong" topology is finer than the weak one, so that any closed set w.r.t. the weak topology is a closed set w.r.t. the "strong" topology.
The "only if" part:
Let $C$ be a "strongly" closed and convex subset. Define $U=E\setminus C$ and $z\in U$. The Hahn-Banach theorem* provides the existence of some $u\in E'$ and $\alpha\in\mathbb{R}$ such that
$$u(z)<\alpha<u(y)$$
for all $y\in C$. Then, $\left\{x\in E\,\vert\,u(x)<\alpha\right\}$ is a "weakly" open set included in $U$ and containing $z$. It is true for any $z\in U$, so that $U$ is "weakly" open and $C$ is "weakly" closed.
*One version of the Hahn-Banach theorem can be expressed as follows: Let $V$ be a real vector space, and $A,B\subset V$ two non-empty convex sets. If $A\cap B=\emptyset$ and $\text{int}(A)\neq\emptyset$, then there exists an hyperplane separating $A$ and $B$, i.e. $f\in V'$ and $\alpha\in\mathbb{R}$ such that
$$f(a)<\alpha<f(b)$$
for all $a\in A$ and for all $b\in B$.