Let $A\in\mathbb{C}^{n\times n}$, show that $$\frac12\|A\|_2\leq \sup_{\|u\|_2=1}|u^HAu|,$$ where $\|A\|_2$ is the 2-norm of $A$.
2026-03-27 21:18:59.1774646339
Show that $\frac12\|A\|_2\leq \sup_{\|u\|_2=1}|u^HAu|$.
59 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in MATRIX-NORMS
- Inequality regarding norm of a positive definite matrix
- Operator norm calculation for simple matrix
- Equivalence of computing trace norm of matrix
- Spectral norm minimization
- Frobenius and operator norms of rank 1 matrices
- Prove the induced matrix norm $\|A\|_\infty = \max_i \| a^*_i \|_1$
- $l_2 \rightarrow l_\infty$ induced matrix norm
- Is it possible to upper bound this family of matrices in operator norm?
- Upper bound this family of matrices in induced $2$-norm
- Operator norm (induced $2$-norm) of a Kronecker tensor
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
1.) all vectors are constrained to have a length (2 norm) of one
2.) for notational simplicity, I assume WLOG that the Hermitian part of $A$ has a maximal singular value at least as large as the maximal singular value of the skew-hermitian part of $A$. (If this wasn't true, the only alteration would be on the 3rd to last line, we'd change the plus sign to a minus sign)
$\Big \Vert A \Big \Vert_2$
$= \Big \Vert \frac{1}{2}\big(A+A^*\big) + \frac{1}{2}\big(A-A^*\big) \Big \Vert_2 $
$\leq \frac{1}{2}\Big \Vert \big(A+A^*\big)\Big\Vert_2 + \frac{1}{2}\Big\Vert \big(A-A^*\big) \Big \Vert_2 $
$= \max_{x} \frac{1}{2}\Big\{\Big \vert \mathbf x^*\big(A+A^*\big)\mathbf x\Big \vert\Big\} + \max_{y} \frac{1}{2}\Big\{\Big \vert \mathbf y^*\big(A-A^*\big)\mathbf y\Big \vert\Big\} $
$\leq 2 \cdot \max_{x} \frac{1}{2}\Big\{\Big \vert \mathbf x^*\big(A+A^*\big)\mathbf x\Big \vert\Big\} $
$\leq 2 \cdot \max_{x} \frac{1}{2}\Big\{\Big \vert \mathbf x^*\big(A+A^*\big)\mathbf x +\mathbf x^*\big(A-A^*\big)\mathbf x\Big \vert\Big\} $
$= 2 \cdot \max_{x} \Big \vert \mathbf x^*A\mathbf x \Big \vert $
justifications:
sub-additivity of operator 2 norm, normal matrices have maximal singular values given by modulus of a quadratic form. Finally recall that a quadratic Hermitian form is purely real and a quadratic skew-hermitian form is purely imaginary