I am currently studying for a measure theory final and have come across a past short exam question that reads "Let $\mathcal A_1$ and $\mathcal A_2$ be a $\sigma$-algebra of subsets of a set X. Show that $\mathcal A_1$ $\cap$ $\mathcal A_2$ is also a $\sigma$-algebra." Conceptually I cannot quite grasp this. Since $\mathcal A_1$ and $\mathcal A_2$ both have the set X as an element by the definition of a $\sigma$-algebra, how can we know that the intersection of $\mathcal A_1$ and $\mathcal A_2$ also has X as an element? A proof of this would be really great or even just a push in the right direction. Thanks in advance.
2026-03-25 23:37:11.1774481831
Show that $\mathcal A_1$ $\cap$ $\mathcal A_2$ is also a $\sigma$-algebra
539 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MEASURE-THEORY
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- I can't undestand why $ \{x \in X : f(x) > g(x) \} = \bigcup_{r \in \mathbb{Q}}{\{x\in X : f(x) > r\}\cap\{x\in X:g(x) < r\}} $
- Trace $\sigma$-algebra of a product $\sigma$-algebra is product $\sigma$-algebra of the trace $\sigma$-algebras
- Meaning of a double integral
- Random variables coincide
- Convergence in measure preserves measurability
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- $f\in L_{p_1}\cap L_{p_2}$ implies $f\in L_{p}$ for all $p\in (p_1,p_2)$
Related Questions in LEBESGUE-MEASURE
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- property of Lebesgue measure involving small intervals
- Is $L^p(\Omega)$ separable over Lebesgue measure.
- Lebesgue measure and limit of the integral.
- uncountable families of measurable sets, in particular balls
- Joint CDF of $X, Y$ dependent on $X$
- Show that $ Tf $ is continuous and measurable on a Hilbert space $H=L_2((0,\infty))$
- True or False Question on Outer measure.
- Which of the following is an outer measure?
- Prove an assertion for a measure $\mu$ with $\mu (A+h)=\mu (A)$
Related Questions in MEASURABLE-SETS
- Measurable and lebesgue measurable sets
- Diffeomorphisms and measurable sets
- Show that there exists an open interval $(a,b)$ such that $m(E\cap(a,b)) > \frac{1}{2}m(a,b) > 0$ when $m(E) > 0$
- Why is the set $\{x \mid f(x) \not= g(x)\}$ measurable in a topological hausdorff space?
- A consequence of the Selection Theorem for the Effros Borel space F(X) - self study
- Direct sum of subgroups of $\mathbb{Q}^n$ with $\mathbb{Q}$ is a Borel map - Self study
- Continuous map from subset of $\mathcal{C}$ (Cantor) to non-measurable set.
- Upper bound for some measurable sets given the inequality $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \mu (A_{n}) \leq \mu (\bigcup_{n=1}^{\infty} A_{n}) + \epsilon$
- Proof explanation: $I_A$ is measurable$ \iff A$ is measurable
- Prove measurability of the set of lines starting from measurable set.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
As mentioned by @Reveillark, you shall need the definition of intersection of sets.
Based on it, we can proceed as follows.
Let $\Omega$ be a nonempty set and $\mathcal{A}_{1}$ and $\mathcal{A}_{2}$ be $\sigma$-algebras on $\Omega$.
Then clearly $\Omega\in\mathcal{A}_{1}\cap\mathcal{A}_{2}$, because $\Omega\in\mathcal{A}_{i}$ for $i = 1,2$.
Now let us assume that $A\in\mathcal{A}_{1}\cap\mathcal{A}_{2}$. Thus $A\in\mathcal{A}_{1}$ and $A\in\mathcal{A}_{2}$. But $\mathcal{A}_{i}$ are $\sigma$-algebras.
Then $A^{c}\in\mathcal{A}_{1}$ and $A^{c}\in\mathcal{A}_{2}$. Consequently, $A^{c}\in\mathcal{A}_{1}\cap\mathcal{A}_{2}$.
At last but not least, let us suppose that $A_{n}\in\mathcal{A}_{1}\cap\mathcal{A}_{2}$ for $n\in\mathbb{N}$. Since $\mathcal{A}_{i}$ are $\sigma$-algebras, one has that \begin{align*} \left(\bigcup_{n\in\mathbb{N}}A_{n}\in\mathcal{A}_{1}\right)\wedge\left(\bigcup_{n\in\mathbb{N}}A_{n}\in\mathcal{A}_{2}\right) \Rightarrow \bigcup_{n\in\mathbb{N}}A_{n}\in\mathcal{A}_{1}\cap\mathcal{A}_{2} \end{align*}
and we are done.
Hopefully this helps.