Show that $p^*(n)=n^{-2/3}$ is the threshold function for the property $G(n,p)$ contains at least $n/6$ pairwise vertex disjoint triangles. I'm considering the probability that some set of $n/2$ vertices is triangle free, but still stuck.
2026-03-25 15:58:26.1774454306
Show that $p^*(n)=n^{-2/3}$ is the threshold function
942 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PROBABILISTIC-METHOD
- Proof by probabilistic method for coins on chessboard puzzle
- Proving lower bound of row/column occurencies of numbers in 2D n-element grid
- Translating an Arithmetic Progression in $\mathbf Z/p\mathbf Z^*$, how much Overlap is Possible?
- Clique numbers and Theorem 4.5.1 in "The Probabilistic Method" by Alon and Spencer
- $\frac{N}{n}$; probability
- Why a randomly chosen element of a class satisfying property `p`, implies existence of an element of said class that satisfies `p`?
- Expected number of hamiltonian paths in a tournament
- Finding threshold for Erdos-Renyi random graph to be connected using branching process
- Theorem of Hardy & Ramanujan - second moment Method
- Deviating from the mean +-1 variables
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Below is my solution when I met the problem in a homework. And the main reference is
Alon, Noga, and Raphael Yuster. "Threshold functions for H-factors." Combinatorics, Probability and Computing 2.2 (1993): 137-144.
We claim that $p = n^{-2/3}$ is a threshold function for the given property. WLOG, we assume that $6$ divides $n$.
Lemma 2.1: There exists a positive constant $c$ such that almost surely $G(n, cn^{-2/3})$ contains less than $n/6$ pairwise vertex disjoint triangles.
Proof: Let $\{A_i : i \in I\}$ denote the set of all distinct labeled copies of $K_3$ in the complete labeled graph on $n$ vertices. Let $B_i$ be the event that $A_i \subset G(n, p)$, and let $X_i$ be the indicator random variable for $B_i$. Let $X = \sum_{i \in I} X_i$ be the number of distinct copies of $K_3$ in $G(n, p)$ (note that here we do not need the copies to be vertex disjoint). Suffice it to show that $X < n/6$ with high probability. It's easy to check that $$E[X] = \binom{n}{3} p^3 \leq c^3 n/6,$$ which can be upper bounded by $n/12$ with sufficiently small $c$, and implies that $E[X] = \Theta(n)$. For two copies $A_i$ and $A_j$ we say $i \sim j$ if they share one edge, and over all ordered pairs, let $$\Delta = \sum_{i \sim j} \Pr[B_i \wedge B_j].$$ As $Var[X] \leq E[X] + \Delta$, it remains to show that $\Delta = o(E^2[X])$ before using Chebyshev's Inequality to complete the proof. Actually, $$\Delta = \binom{n}{5} 5! p^5 \leq c^5 n^{5/3} = o(E^2[X]),$$ with sufficiently large $n$, completing the proof.
Lemma2.2: There exists a positive constant $C$ such that almost surely $G(n, Cn^{-2/3})$ contains at least $n/6$ pairwise vertex disjoint triangles.
Proof: Consider random graph $G(n/2, Cn^{-2/3})$, with the same notations used in the proof of Lemma $2.1$ (except that the number of vertices is $n/2$ now), we have $$\mu = E[X] \geq C^3n/16$$ and $$\Delta \leq C^5 n^{5/3}/32,$$ with sufficiently large $C$ and $n$. As $\Delta > \mu$ when $C$ and $n$ are sufficiently large, by the extended Janson inequality, we have $$\Pr[X=0] = \Pr[\bigwedge_{i \in I} \overline{B_i}] \leq e^{-\mu^2/2\Delta} \leq e^{-100n^{1/3}}.$$ Therefore, we conclude that almost surely $G(m, Cn^{-2/3})$ contains a triangle if $m \geq n/2$. From a random graph $G(n, p)$, with probability as least $(1 - e^{-100n^{1/3}})^{n/6}$, we can repeatedly do for $i \in [n/6]$,
[1] Find a triangle in the current graph on the remaining $n - 3(i-1)$ vertices
[2] Remove the $3$ vertices and all edges incident to them, now we essentially have $G(n-3i, Cn^{-2/3})$
Finally, we have $n/6$ pairwise vertex disjoint triangles with high probability, completing the proof of both the lemma and the whole problem.