Let $M$ be a smooth manifold, and let $p:E\to M$ be a topological covering map. Then $E$ has a smooth structure so that $p$ becomes a smooth covering map. (This is shown in Proposition 4.40 of Lee's Introduction to Smooth Manifolds). Next I want to show that such a smooth structure of $E$ is unique. How do I have to start to do this? I should suppose $E$ has two different smooth structures and smooth covering maps $p,q:E \to M$ with respect to the two smooth structures, respectively, and then what I have to do? A smooth structure is by definition a maximal smooth atlas. Do I have to show that two atlases are the same by showing inclusions?
2026-03-27 10:48:01.1774608481
Showing smooth structure of a covering space of a smooth manifold is unique
802 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in SMOOTH-MANIFOLDS
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Possible condition on locally Euclidean subsets of Euclidean space to be embedded submanifold
- "Defining a smooth structure on a topological manifold with boundary"
- Hyperboloid is a manifold
- The graph of a smooth map is a manifold
- A finite group G acts freely on a simply connected manifold M
- An elementary proof that low rank maps cannot be open
- What does it mean by standard coordinates on $R^n$
- Partial Differential Equation using theory of manifolds
- Showing that a diffeomorphism preserves the boundary
Related Questions in COVERING-SPACES
- Definition of regular covering maps: independent of choice of point
- Universal cover $\mathbb{S}^3 \rightarrow SO(3)$ through Quaternions.
- How to find a minimal planar covering of a graph
- Questions from Forster's proof regarding unbranched holomorphic proper covering map
- $\mathbb{S}^2$ and $\mathbb{RP}^2$ are the only compact surfaces with finite number of covers.
- Is the monodromy action of the universal covering of a Riemann surface faithful?
- Left half of complex plane and graph of logarithm are diffeomorphic?
- regular covering proof
- The map $p : S^1 → S^1$ given by $p(z) = z^2$ is a covering map. Generalize to $p(z) = z^n$.
- If $H \le \pi_1(X,x)$ is conjugate to $P_*(\pi_1(Y, y))$, then $H \cong P_*(\pi_1(Y, y'))$ for some $y' \in P^{-1}(x)$
Related Questions in SMOOTH-FUNCTIONS
- Connecting smooth functions in a smooth way
- Is the restriction (to lower dimensions) of a smooth function still smooth?
- Understanding the proof of the Concentration-Compactness principle
- Does an integral inequality imply a pointwise inequality?
- A weird definition of regular function
- Are charts for smooth manifolds homeomorphisms or diffeomorphisms?
- Find a sequence $(\phi_n)_n \subset C^{\infty}_c(\mathbb{R}^N)$ which converges in both $L^p(\nu)$ and $L^q(\mu)$ to $1_E$
- Straight Lines are Strict Minimizers of Arclength in Euclidean Space
- Several Questions on Smooth Urysohn's Lemma
- For what functions is $\lim_{n\to \infty}|f^{(n)}(x)|=0$? (Where $f^{(n)}(x)$ is the $n$th derivative of $f$)
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
You should not introduce a new covering map $q$.
What you are asked to prove is that if $\mathcal T_1,\mathcal T_2$ are maximal smooth atlases for $E$, if $p : E \to M$ is a smooth map with respect to $\mathcal T_1$, and if $p$ is also smooth with respect to $\mathcal T_2$, then $\mathcal T_1 = \mathcal T_2$.
To prove that, choose $x \in E$, and choose an evenly covered open neighborhood $U \subset M$ of $p(x)$ which is the domain of a chart $\phi : U \to \mathbb R^n$ for the given smooth atlas of $M$.
Let $V \subset E$ be an open neighborhood of $x$ such that $p$ restricts to a homeomorphism $p \mid V : V \mapsto U$.
It follows that $\phi \circ (p \mid V) : V \to \mathbb R^n$ is a smooth map with respect to atlas $\mathcal T_1$ and with respect to atlas $\mathcal T_2$, and therefore $\phi \circ (p \mid V)$ is a chart in both of those atlases. One therefore has a cover of $E$ by charts that are in both atlases, so the atlases are equal.