Showing that $p_n = n\log n + n\log \log n + O(n)$ (simplified prime approximation)

513 Views Asked by At

This StackExchange question -- Is the $n$-th prime smaller than $n(\log n + \log\log n-1+\frac{\log\log n}{\log n})$? -- assumes the following statement: $$\log n + \log\log n -1 \leq \frac{p_n}{n} \leq \log n + \log\log n.$$ My question is: how can we prove that statement?

Using the version of the Prime Number Theorem that states $$\pi (n) \sim \frac{n}{\log n},$$ we can quite easily show that $$p_n \sim n\log n,$$ or in other words $$p_n = n\log n + o(n\log n),$$ but this doesn't seem to get us any closer to a big-O estimate of the kind assumed in the above question. Is there a standard, quick method of obtaining such an estimate?

2

There are 2 best solutions below

0
On BEST ANSWER

(Answering my own question because I was given the solution elsewhere.)

By a known result and simple logarithm laws we have

$$\begin{align} p_n &\sim n\log n \\ \log p_n &= \log n + \log \log n + o(1). \end{align}$$

We also know that $\pi (n) = \frac{n}{\log n} + O\left(\frac{n}{(\log n)^2}\right),$ and therefore $$n = \pi (p_n) = \frac{p_n}{\log p_n} + O\left(\frac{p_n}{(\log p_n)^2} \right).$$

Meanwhile $O\left(\frac{p_n}{(\log p_n)^2} \right)$ simplifies, using the little-o estimates above, to $O\left(\frac{n}{\log n} \right)$. Plugging this in gives $$n= \frac{p_n}{\log n +\log\log n + o(n)} +O\left(\frac{n}{\log n} \right),$$

and therefore, just by rearranging terms and cancellation, $$p_n = n\log n + n\log\log n + O(n).$$

4
On

The question you are asking especially the lower limit was proved by Pierre Dusart using the first 3.5 million zeroes of the Riemann zeta function so don't expect an easy answer. Here is the full solution.

The $k$-th prime is greater than $k(\ln k + \ln \ln k − 1)$ for $k \ge 2$