I am having a difficult time showing that the exponential map $\mathrm{exp}: \mathfrak{sl}(2, \mathbb{R}) \rightarrow \mathrm{SL}(2, \mathbb{R})$ is not surjective. I have, however, worked out that $\mathfrak{sl}(2, \mathbb{R})$ is given by $\{A \in M(n, \mathbb{R}) \mid \mathrm{trace}(A) = 0\}$.
I will be appreciative of any help. Thank you
Can you find a matrix $X\in\mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb R)$ such that $\exp X=\left(\begin{smallmatrix}-1&1\\0&-1\end{smallmatrix}\right)$?
Suppose we have such a matrix $X$. Since $\exp X$ is not diagonalizable, $X$ is also not diagonalizable, and it must have a double eigenvalue. Since it has trace zero, that eigenvalue is necessarily zero. Now, if $\lambda$ is an eigenvalue of $X$, $\exp(\lambda)$ is then an eigenvalue of $\left(\begin{smallmatrix}-1&1\\0&-1\end{smallmatrix}\right)$, so that $\lambda=\pi i+2\pi i k$ for some $k\in\mathbb Z$. Yet this cannot be zero!