Let language L contains $ \leq $ and countable set of constants symbols $c_{1}, c_{2}, ... $. Is there a bounded theory T in language L, With the following property? For every model A of T, there is model B of T such that $B \preceq_{\Sigma_{1}} A $ and $ c_{i}$'s are cofinal in B. Bounded Theory means a Theory that can be axiomatized by bounded formulas. A quantifier free formula is a bounded formula and if $\varphi(x)$ is bounded, then so are $\exists x ( x\leq t \wedge \varphi (x))$ and $\forall x (x \leq t \to \varphi (x) )$, Where t is a term in language L.
2026-04-11 11:14:13.1775906053
$\Sigma_{1}$-embedding in models of bounded theories
85 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MODEL-THEORY
- What is the definition of 'constructible group'?
- Translate into first order logic: "$a, b, c$ are the lengths of the sides of a triangle"
- Existence of indiscernible set in model equivalent to another indiscernible set
- A ring embeds in a field iff every finitely generated sub-ring does it
- Graph with a vertex of infinite degree elementary equiv. with a graph with vertices of arbitrarily large finite degree
- What would be the function to make a formula false?
- Sufficient condition for isomorphism of $L$-structures when $L$ is relational
- Show that PA can prove the pigeon-hole principle
- Decidability and "truth value"
- Prove or disprove: $\exists x \forall y \,\,\varphi \models \forall y \exists x \,\ \varphi$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Edit: I assumed in the answer below that a "bounded theory" is axiomatized by a set of bounded sentences. But after reading the quote from Buss in your comment below, it's clear that this is not the intended definition. Rather, a bounded theory is axiomatized by a set of bounded formulas, and there's a convention in play that a formula with free variables should be interpreted as its universal closure.
So a bounded theory is one that's axiomaized by sentences of the form $\forall \overline{x}\, \psi(\overline{x})$, where $\psi$ is a bounded formula. In particular, any universal theory (like the theory of linear orders) is a bounded theory.
That means this is not an answer to the question. But I'll leave it here, since someone might find it interesting.
It's implicit in your question (since you say "cofinal") that you want $\leq$ to be a (partial) order on every model of $T$. But no consistent bounded theory implies that $\leq$ is a partial order. So this answer won't really answer your main question, but it shows you at least need to reformulate the question.
Indeed, let $M$ be a model of $T$. Let $M'$ be any structure containing $M$ such that the elements in $M'\setminus M$ are not $\leq$-related to any elements of $M$. In particular, you can make the relation $\leq$ fail to be reflexive or transitive or both on these new elements.
Now you can prove the following claim by induction: for any bounded formula $\varphi(\overline{x})$ and any $\overline{a}$ in $M$, $M\models\varphi(\overline{a})$ if and only if $M'\models\varphi(\overline{a})$. In particular $M'\models T$.
The quantifier-free case is easy. The quantifier cases are handled by the observation that $M$ contains all the terms with parameters in $M$, so any witness for a bounded quantifier has to come from $M$ (since no new element is $\leq$-related to any of these terms).