The Ramanujan $\tau(n)$ seemed to have random positive/negative signs:
n 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ...
tau(n) 1 -24 252 -1472 4830 −6048 −16744 84480 ...
Is there a closed-form formula for the sign of $\tau(n)$?
By closed-form formula for $sign(\tau(n))$, I meant something like (1) if $n=2 mod(263)$, then $sign(\tau(n))>0$; (2) if $n=3 mod(p)$ and $p$ is any prime, then $sign(\tau(n))<0$; If $n=12398888$, an arbitrary number, then $sign(\tau(n))>0$ etc.
Or simply put: For a given number $n$, what is the sign of $\tau(n)$, 1,-1, or 0?
Thanks- mike
EDIT: $\tau(mn)=\tau(m)\tau(n)$ whenever $(m,n)=1$ (Thanks to Peter Humphries!), If $n=p_1^{r_1}\cdots p_m^{r_m}$ where $p_1,...,p_m$ are prime factors, then $sign(\tau(n))=(sign(\tau(p_1^{r_1}))\cdots (sign(\tau(p_m^{r_m}))$.
So the problem is reduced to find the formula for $sign(\tau(p^r)$ where $p$ is any prime number and $r$ is any positive number.
I'm quite certain there's no closed form for the sign of $\tau(n)$, but the behaviour of the sign of $\tau(n)$ is covered in some detail in this paper of Barry Mazur, and explained in some more detail by Peter Sarnak.
EDIT: Your statement about the multiplicativity of $\tau(n)$ is incorrect. The function $\tau(n)$ is multiplicative but not completely multiplicative, which is to say that $\tau(mn) = \tau(m) \tau(n)$ holds whenever $(m,n) = 1$ (that is, whenever $m$ and $n$ are coprime), but not in general.