Silly question about descent

237 Views Asked by At

Most sources say descent is defining an object over $S$ using objects over $U_i$ for some cover $\left\{ U_i \right\}$ of $S$. If I replace the covering family with a single arrow $\coprod _i U_i\rightarrow S$, then it's not at all true that giving an object over each $U_i$ is the same as giving an object over $\coprod _iU_i$. How to resolve this?