I’m looking for a ring without an multiplicative identity, and in which every element $x$ has a weak inverse $y$ such that $xyx=x,yxy=y$ preferably simple to construct and or of finite size.
If it has an agreed upon name, please mention it.
2026-03-25 07:47:50.1774424870
Simple example for a rng with an inverse semi-group as the multiplicative group
99 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ABSTRACT-ALGEBRA
- Feel lost in the scheme of the reducibility of polynomials over $\Bbb Z$ or $\Bbb Q$
- Integral Domain and Degree of Polynomials in $R[X]$
- Fixed points of automorphisms of $\mathbb{Q}(\zeta)$
- Group with order $pq$ has subgroups of order $p$ and $q$
- A commutative ring is prime if and only if it is a domain.
- Conjugacy class formula
- Find gcd and invertible elements of a ring.
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- polynomial remainder theorem proof, is it legit?
- $(2,1+\sqrt{-5}) \not \cong \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ as $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$-module
Related Questions in RNGS
- Non-unital ring $(2\mathbb{Z})[X]$ is not Noetherian
- In a commutative ring $R$ if, for every $a\in R$, the smallest ideal containing $a$ is equal to $Ra$ then $R$ has identity?
- Prime property in noncommutative rings without identity
- Can a ring have no zero divisors while being non-commutative and having no unity?
- Example of two subrings with unity of a ring with unity whose intersection is non trivial and has no unity.
- In a commutative rng with comaximal ideals, product equals intersection as well?
- Equivalence of Definitions of Prime Ideal in Ring without $1$.
- Example of a finite ring with identity containing a ring without identity
- Books on Rings without Identity
- In a commutative ring without identity, is $(a)(b)\subset (ab)$ or $(ab)\subset (a)(b)$?
Related Questions in INVERSE-SEMIGROUPS
- $C^*$-algebra norm computations
- Involution on inverse semigroups
- Example of an inverse semigroup
- A reflective subcategory of the category of inverse semigroups.
- Semilattice of idempotent
- Existence of a commutative inverse semigroup with no identity element
- example of monoids
- Characters on inverse semigroups: Hahn-Banach?
- Ways of describing/classifying a strange structure where $a\ast a = b; b\ast b = a; a\ast b = a$
- Prove the following characterization for inverse semigroups
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
A slight modification of paulinho's suggestion in the comments works: we can take the rng $M_{\infty}(\mathbb{R}) = \bigcup_n M_n(\mathbb{R})$ of $\mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N}$ matrices such that all but finitely many entries are nonzero. Every element lies in some $M_n(\mathbb{R})$ and so has a Moore-Penrose pseudoinverse. The identity matrices $I_n \in M_n(\mathbb{R})$ provide a sequence of approximate identities but there is no global identity.
Edit: A simpler example in the same spirit: take an infinite direct sum $\bigoplus_i F_i$ of any sequence of fields. The weak inverse is given componentwise by returning either the inverse if it exists or zero otherwise. Again there is a sequence of approximate identities but no global identity. (This example was inspired by thinking about compactly supported functions on the real line and then simplified and generalized. Note also that $\bigoplus_i \mathbb{R}$ embeds into $M_{\infty}(\mathbb{R})$ as the subrng of diagonal matrices.)
Edit #2: Okay, this was fun. Let's call a rng satisfying the second condition (every element has a weak inverse) a weak division rng. Note that if such a rng has an identity then in particular it must be von Neumann regular and much is known about these. It's a nice exercise to show that every matrix ring over a field (probably over a division ring too but I haven't checked this) is a weak division rng.
Here are two claims:
You didn't ask about Claim #2 so I won't include the proof unless you want it; here's a proof of Claim 1. First, every finite rng $R$ has a canonical decomposition into a finite product
$$R = \prod_p R_p$$
where $R_p$ is the $p$-power part of $R$ ($p$ prime). Moreover, weak inverses exist in such a product iff they exist componentwise, so the problem reduces to the case that $R = R_p$ for some $p$; we assume this from now on, as well as that $R$ is a weak division rng.
Suppose $x \in R$ satisfies $p^2 x = 0$ but $px \neq 0$ (so $x$ has additive order $p^2$). By assumption $px$ has a weak inverse $y$, so that
$$(px)y(px) = px.$$
But $(px)y(px) = p^2 xyx = p^2 x = 0$, which is a contradiction; we conclude that $R$ has no such elements $x$. (This can also be phrased without contradiction but it's a bit more unintuitive.) So $R$ is an $\mathbb{F}_p$-vector space and hence an $\mathbb{F}_p$-algebra.
Next, consider the unitization $R \times \mathbb{F}_p$, where we freely adjoin a unit to $R$ as an $\mathbb{F}_p$-algebra.
Proposition: With the above hypotheses, $R \times \mathbb{F}_p$ has trivial Jacobson radical and hence is semiprimitive.
(Edit #4: This proof had a gap but I fixed it. Hopefully!)
Proof. We want to show that if $(x, c) \in J(R \times \mathbb{F}_p)$ is an element of the Jacobson radical then it must be equal to zero. The projection to $\mathbb{F}_p$ equips $\mathbb{F}_p$ with the structure of a simple $R \times \mathbb{F}_p$-module, so in order for $(x, c)$ to be in the Jacobson radical, which requires that it act trivially on every simple module, we must have $c = 0$.
If $c = 0$, recall that if $S$ is an artinian ring then the Jacobson radical $J(S)$ is a nilpotent ideal and that every element of $J(S)$ generates a nilpotent left ideal. But the left ideal generated by $(x, 0)$ contains $(yx, 0)$ where $y$ is the weak inverse of $x$, and since $yx$ is idempotent ($yxyx = yx$) it follows that the left ideal generated by $(x, 0)$ can't be nilpotent unless $yx = 0$, which gives $xyx = x = 0$. $\Box$
Now it follows as a corollary that the unitization $R \times \mathbb{F}_p$ is both semiprimitive and (finite, hence) artinian, and so must be semisimple. The semisimple $\mathbb{F}_p$-algebras are precisely the finite products of matrix rings over finite fields $\mathbb{F}_{p^i}$ (by the Artin-Wedderburn theorem plus Wedderburn's little theorem), so the unitization must be such a product. Furthermore it admits a quotient map to $\mathbb{F}_p$ (with kernel $R$), so one of the factors in this product must be $\mathbb{F}_p$, and the kernel must be another finite product of matrix rings over finite fields and hence in particular must have a unit.