Every finite graph can be embedded on some compact surface of sufficient genus such that no two edges cross. If $S$ is a finite simplicial complex of dimension $n$, can $S$ be embedded in some compact Riemann Manifold of dimension $n+1$ such that no two simplices intersect?
2026-03-25 12:52:17.1774443137
Simplicial complexes embedded on a compact manifold
321 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GRAPH-THEORY
- characterisation of $2$-connected graphs with no even cycles
- Explanation for the static degree sort algorithm of Deo et al.
- A certain partition of 28
- decomposing a graph in connected components
- Is it true that if a graph is bipartite iff it is class 1 (edge-coloring)?
- Fake induction, can't find flaw, every graph with zero edges is connected
- Triangle-free graph where every pair of nonadjacent vertices has exactly two common neighbors
- Inequality on degrees implies perfect matching
- Proving that no two teams in a tournament win same number of games
- Proving that we can divide a graph to two graphs which induced subgraph is connected on vertices of each one
Related Questions in RIEMANNIAN-GEOMETRY
- What is the correct formula for the Ricci curvature of a warped manifold?
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Geodesically convex neighborhoods
- The induced Riemannian metric is not smooth on the diagonal
- Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic notions of Harmonic maps.
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Why is the index of a harmonic map finite?
- A closed manifold of negative Ricci curvature has no conformal vector fields
Related Questions in SIMPLICIAL-COMPLEX
- What is the intersection of the vertices of a face of a simplicial complex?
- Simplicial complex underlying space homeomorphic to torus/klein bottle
- Fixed points of simplicial maps
- Homotopy type of simplicial complexes
- Non-contractible simplicial complex and Euler characteristic 1
- Persistence Homology on a grid Distance measure
- Finding chains with a given boundary
- Is there a time where the link of a subset is not equal to the boundary of its star?
- Edge-to-edge incidence structure of a graph
- Triangulation of the projective plane (number of points required)
Related Questions in COMPACT-MANIFOLDS
- Compact 3-manifold with trivial first homology
- The number of charts needed to cover a compact manifold
- Why torus space we could see it in $\mathbb R^3$
- Projection on compact submanifolds
- Finding a heegaard splitting for general $\sum_g\times I/\phi$
- Non-Homeomorphicity of Compact surfaces
- Geodesic curvature change under conformal metrics
- Natural surjection that maps loops to cycles
- Extending functions on boundary into M as a harmonic function
- Every abelian normal subgroup of a connected and compact Lie group lies in the center
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Here is the complete story:
Let $X$ be a (finite, although, it is not really necessary) $k$-dimensional simplicial complex. Then $X$ always embeds in some (smooth) manifold $M$ of dimension $2k$. To sketch a proof of this: $X$ can be immersed (one needs to define what this means) in $R^{2k}$ (this is a form of Whitney's immersion theorem). Then pull-back of a regular neighborhood of the image of this immersion yields the desired manifold $M$.
For each $k$, there exists a finite $k$-dimensional simplicial complex which does not embed in any manifold of dimension $2k-1$. A specific example is given by the $k$-fold product of copies of the "tripod" $T$, which is the unique finite tree with four vertices, one of which (the "center") has valence 3. Let $v\in T$ be this center. The key to the proof is that the link $L$ of a vertex of $X$ corresponding to $(v,...,v)$ is isomorphic to the $k$-fold join of the copies of the set on 3 elements. This complex is known not to admit embeddings in $S^{2k-2}$ (this result is due to van Kampen). However, if $X$ embeds in a manifold of dimension $n$, the links of vertices of $X$ embed in the sphere $S^{n-1}$. Hence, $X$ does not embed in any $2k-1$-dimensional manifold.
The simplest example that you can work out by hand is the product $X=T\times T$. The link of $(v,v)$ in $X$ is the complete bipartite graph $K_{3,3}$. The latter does not embed in $S^2$ (this is an application of the Jordan curve theorem), hence, $X$ does not embed in any 3-dimensional manifold.
Shapiro, Arnold, Obstructions to the imbedding of a complex in a euclidean space. I: The first obstruction, Ann. Math. (2) 66, 256-269 (1957). ZBL0085.37701.
Van Kampen, E. R., Komplexe in euklidischen Räumen, Abhandlungen Hamburg 9, 72-78 (1932). ZBL58.0615.02.
Wu, Wen-tsün, A theory of imbedding, immersion, and isotopy of polytopes in a Euclidean space, Peking: Science Press. xv, 291 pp. (1965). ZBL0177.26402.