If we have a quaternion Q1 and Q2 that defines rotations (r1, r2) of an object about an axis (x1, y1, z1) and (x2,y2,z2). How to represent simultaneous action of the both quaternions?. Is there any way to define a "resultant quaternion" like a resultant vector?. I would like to rotate a vector when influenced by Q1 and Q2 simultaneously. Thanks for any input.
2026-03-30 00:52:59.1774831979
Simultaneous action of two Quaternions
465 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in QUATERNIONS
- Intuition behind quaternion multiplication with zero scalar
- Universal cover $\mathbb{S}^3 \rightarrow SO(3)$ through Quaternions.
- Variance of a set of quaternions?
- Finding the Euler angle/axis from a 2 axes rotation but that lies on the original 2 axes' plane
- How many different quaternions $q$ are in a satisfying equation $q^2 = 1$?
- Dual quaternions displacement
- Why quaternions is a group?
- Why does the real part of quaternion conjugation with a pure quaternion stay 0?
- Why does the multiplication in a division algebra depends on every component?
- derive quaternion from rotation matrix, via eigenvector
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Quaternions are not necessary for the answer I am giving, as this can be done in any dimension using lie algebras.
If $R$ and $S$ are rotations, then $RS$ and $SR$ are constructed by first performing one rotation and then the other - you don't perform both at the same time. We need to create an interpretation for "at the same time." The way to do this is through lie theory. Heuristically, every rotation is infinitely many applications of infinitessimal rotations, and so if we combine the infinitessimal rotations associated with $R$ and $S$ and apply it infinitely many times we get your desired "resultant."
Now let's make these ideas rigorous. The matrix Lie group $\mathrm{SO}(n)$ is a differentiable manifold, so any differentiable path $p:[0,1]\to\mathrm{SO}(n)$ can be differentiated and evaluated at $0$ yielding a tangent vector (that is, an element of $M_n(\mathbb{R})$ which is tangent to $\mathrm{SO}(n)$ at the identity $I$). The collection of all of these velocity vectors is a vector subspace $\mathfrak{so}(n)\subset M_n(\mathbb{R})$. It actually has more structure making it a lie algebra, but we don't need to discuss the commutator.
Any map $\phi:\mathbb{R}\to\mathrm{SO}(n)$ which is a homomorphism is called a one-parameter subgroup. So for instance in 3D, if $R(\ell,\theta)$ denotes the rotation around an oriented axis $\ell$ by an angle $\theta$, then the map $\theta\mapsto R(\ell,\theta)$ will be a one-parameter subgroup for every $\ell$. Every velocity vector $X\in\mathfrak{so}(n)$ is actually the velocity vector of a one-parameter subgroup $\phi(t):=\exp(tX)$.
This function $\exp:\mathfrak{so}(n)\to\mathrm{SO}(n)$ is called the exponential map. We can define it using power series as $\exp(X)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{1}{n!}X^n$, or we could use the more suggestive formula $$\exp(X)=\lim_{n\to\infty}\left(1+\frac{X}{n}\right)^n.$$
To understand this formula, consider the 2-dimensional case, which we can do using the complex plane. The rotations are multiplication by elements of $S^1$ (those $z\in\mathbb{C}$ with $|z|=1$). Specifically, counterclockwise rotation by $\theta$ is multiplication by $e^{i\theta}$. Differentiating $e^{i\theta}$ and evaluating at $\theta=0$ yields a velocity vector $i$. Indeed, the lie algebra here is just the imaginary axis $i\mathbb{R}$. Then for very large $n$, the expression $1+i\theta/n$ is approximately the element of $S^1$ an angle of $\theta/n$ away from $1$, and applying this $n$ times (i.e. taking to the $n$th power) should be approximately rotation by an angle of $\theta$, hence $e^{i\theta}\approx (1+i\theta/n)^n$.
Instead of just considering rotations $R$ and $S$, consider "rotations with speed," i.e. a one-parameter subgroup $R,S:\mathbb{R}\to\mathrm{SO}(n)$. Say they have velocity vectors $E$ and $F$. Then while $R(t)S(t)$ may not be a path, it still has a velocity vector which is $E+F\in\mathfrak{so}(n)$. We can then interpret $E+F$ as the infinitessimal rotation associated with a one-parameter subgroup $\exp(t(E+F))$.
If you want to just work with 3D rotations coming from quaternions, then you can combine $e^{\mathbf{u}}$ and $e^{\mathbf{v}}$ to get $e^{\mathbf{u}+\mathbf{v}}$, however you should be aware that $(e^{\mathbf{u}},e^{\mathbf{v}})\mapsto e^{\mathbf{u}+\mathbf{v}}$ is not well-defined. That is, it's possible to have imaginary quaternions satisfying $e^{\mathbf{u}_1}=e^{\mathbf{u}_2}$ and $e^{\mathbf{v}_1}=e^{\mathbf{v_2}}$ but $e^{\mathbf{u}_1+\mathbf{v}_1}\ne e^{\mathbf{u}_2+\mathbf{v}_2}$.
The way to make sense of this then is to think of it as combining a one-parameter subgroup $e^{t\mathbf{u}}$ with another $e^{t\mathbf{v}}$ to get a third $e^{t(\mathbf{u}+\mathbf{v})}$.