Singular measures on Real line

943 Views Asked by At

Can some one please give me an example of continuous Singular measure on Reals which is not absolutely continuous to cantor-type sets. Thank you.

2

There are 2 best solutions below

10
On BEST ANSWER

Consider the probability measure $\mu_p$ on the Borel sigma-algebra on $[0,1]$, which is the image of the product $\mathop{\otimes}\limits_{n\geqslant1}\beta_p$ of the Bernoulli measures $\beta_p=p\delta_1+(1-p)\delta_0$ on $\{0,1\}$ by the function $U$ defined on $\{0,1\}^\mathbb N$ by $U(x)=\sum\limits_{n=1}^\infty x_n/2^n$ where $x=(x_n)_{n\geqslant1}$.

Then for every $p\ne\frac12$, the measure $\mu_p$ is purely singular, $\mu_p$ has no atom, and every interval with positive (Lebesgue) length has positive measure for $\mu_p$.

In words, under $\mu_p$, the bits of a real number in $[0,1]$ are i.i.d. Bernoulli random variables with probability $p$ of being $1$. If $p=\frac12$, the measure $\mu_\frac12$ is the restriction of the Lebesgue measure to $[0,1]$ hence it is densitable, and this is the exception. Actually, the measures $\mu_p$ and $\mu_q$ are mutually singular for every $p\ne q$.

0
On

Let $C$ be the usual Cantor set, and $\nu_C$ its probability measure. Clearly $\nu_C(A)=0$, where $A$ is the subset of $[0,1]$, consisted of the numbers in which the digit 1 appears in their ternary expansion, while the Lebesgue measure of $A$ is 1. The support of $\nu_C$ is the set of the numbers in which the digit 1 does not appears in their ternary expansion. It is not hard to modify $\nu_C$ so that its support is dense in $[0,1]$ and is still a singular measure. (Singular w.r.t. the Lebesgue and Dirac measures.). So for every Borel set $E\subset\mathbb R$ define: \begin{align} \nu_0(E)&=\nu_c(E) \\ \nu_1(E)&=\nu_0(E)+\tfrac{1}{2}\nu_C\big(\tfrac{1}{3}E+\tfrac{1}{3}\big) \\ \nu_2(E)&=\nu_1(E)+\tfrac{1}{2^3}\nu_C\big(\tfrac{1}{9}E+\tfrac{1}{9}\big)+\tfrac{1}{2^3}\nu_C\big(\tfrac{1}{9}E+\tfrac{7}{9}\big) \\ \nu_3(E)&=\nu_2(E)+\tfrac{1}{2^5}\left(\sum_{i=1}^4\nu_C\big(\tfrac{1}{3^3}E+\tfrac{k_{3,i}}{3^3}\big)\right) \end{align} where $k_{3,i}=1,7,19,25$, and in general $$ \nu_{n+1}(E)=\nu_n(E)+\tfrac{1}{2^{2n+1}}\left(\sum_{i=1}^{2^n}\nu_C\big(\tfrac{1}{3^{n+1}}E+\tfrac{k_{n+1,i}}{3^{n+1}}\big)\right), $$ where $k_{n+1,i}-1$ runs in the sets of the numbers $\{1,2,\ldots,3^n\}$, which miss 1 in their ternary expansion.

Clearly this sequence $\nu_n$ converges, the the measure variation norm, to a positive Borel measure $\nu$, supported in the set of the elements of $[0,1]$ with finite number of aces in their ternary expansion, with $\nu([0,1])=2$. This measure is singular, as its support has zero Lebesgue measure, and it does not contain any Dirac measures, and none of the $\nu_n$ does.

However, I am not sure that you are looking for something like that.