Let $X = (1,2,3,4,5,6,7)$. Find the smallest equivalence relation such that: $(1,2),(2, 3),(5,2), (4,6), (7,7)$ belongs to the relation.
2026-04-01 09:58:10.1775037490
On
Smallest equivalence relation containing given pairs
1.9k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
2
There are 2 best solutions below
0
On
An equivalence relation partitions the set into equivalence classes. If $(a,b)$ is required to be in the relation, they must be in the same equivalence class.
If $\{a,b, ..., k\}$ is an equivalence class, then the following are in the relation: $$\begin{array}{c}(a, a),& (a,b),&\ldots,& (a,k),\\ (b,a),& (b,b),& \ldots,& (b,k), \\ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ (k, a),& (k, b),& \ldots,& (k, k)\end{array}$$
Thus the size of an equivalence relation equals the sum of squares of each partition. So we want the most partitions that allow the relation to contain the required pairs.
- Because $x^2+y^2\leq (x+y)^2$ for all natural numbers (nonnegative integers).
Look at the relations given above.So far we are given: $1$ is related to $2$, $2$ is related to $3$, $2$ is related to $5$, $4$ is related to $6$, and $7$ is related to $7$. Let us call the smallest containing equivalence relation as $E$.
Now, there are three properties of an equivalence relation:
That completes the relation. We summarize by saying the following: There is a theorem that says that equivalence relations divide the set into equivalence classes, where two elements of a class are , in a pair, in $E$. Hence, when we write that $ a \sim b \sim c \sim d$, then it is implied that a pair of each of these elements is in $E$ (so for example, $(a,c) \in E$,$(d,b) \in E$, etc.) This is a convenient notation used to express equivalence relations.
So, you can check from the above analysis, that the following relations are true: $1 \sim 2 \sim 3 \sim 5$, $4 \sim 6$, $7 \sim 7$. So the respective smallest equivalence relation is given by this decomposition, where every pair of elements in each relation are in $E$.
To show that this is the smallest equivalence relation,I will leave as an exercise, but it should be obvious, because all the above elements must be contained in any equivalence relation containing the required elements.