Take some bounded domain, $\Omega \in \mathbb{R}^n$, $n \geq 3$. Denote by $\partial \Omega$ the boundary of $\Omega$, which we take to be Lipschitz. Let $L$ be an elliptic operator that satisfies ellipticity and boundness conditions. Let $u$ be the solution to the following Dirichlet problem: \begin{equation} \begin{cases} Lu = 0 \qquad & \mbox{in} \quad \Omega \\ u = -v &\mbox{on} \quad \partial \Omega \end{cases} \end{equation} Assume that we know the following is true about $v$ \begin{equation} \sup_{\partial \Omega} (|v| + |\nabla v|) \leq C_1 \end{equation} where $C_1$ is some positive constant. I am wondering, as a consequence of the inequality above, can we say \begin{equation} || u ||_{H^{1}(\Omega)} \leq C_2 \end{equation} where $C_2$ is a positive constant, possibly distinct from $C_1$?
2026-03-25 17:52:57.1774461177
Sobolev Bound for solution to Dirichlet Problem from knowledge of boundary estimates
108 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PARTIAL-DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS
- PDE Separation of Variables Generality
- Partial Derivative vs Total Derivative: Function depending Implicitly and Explicitly on Variable
- Transition from theory of PDEs to applied analysis and industrial problems and models with PDEs
- Harmonic Functions are Analytic Evan’s Proof
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- How might we express a second order PDE as a system of first order PDE's?
- Inhomogeneous biharmonic equation on $\mathbb{R}^d$
- PDE: Determine the region above the $x$-axis for which there is a classical solution.
- Division in differential equations when the dividing function is equal to $0$
Related Questions in SOBOLEV-SPACES
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- $\mbox{Cap}_p$-measurability
- If $u\in W^{1,p}(\Omega )$ is s.t. $\nabla u=0$ then $u$ is constant a.e.
- Weak formulation of Robin boundary condition problem
- Variational Formulation - inhomogeneous Neumann boundary
- Why the Sobolev space $W^{1,2}(M,N)$ weak-sequencially closed in $W^{1,2}(\mathbb R^K)$?
- Sobolev space $H^s(Q)$ is Hilbert
- Duhamel's principle for heat equation.
- How to define discrete Sobolev dual norm so that it can be computed?
- Weakly sequentially continuous maps
Related Questions in ELLIPTIC-OPERATORS
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
- Definition of constant coefficient elliptic operator
- Why is the index of a harmonic map finite?
- Trilaterating 2D cartesian coordinates, without Z
- Existence and uniqueness of weak solutions to the homogeneous biharmonic equation.
- Counter example to unique solvability of Dirichlet Problem
- Question on why a solution of this PDE is of class $\;C^4\;$
- $\;{u|}_{\partial \Omega} =0\;$ implies $\; \frac{\partial u}{\partial τ}=0\;$
- Definition of a simple characteristic for an elliptic operator
- What does it mean to have a fully nonlinear elliptic PDE?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
There might be subtleties depending on the exact assumptions that you make, but the general reasoning is as follows.
When $u \in H^1(\Omega)$, its trace on $\partial \Omega$ belongs to $H^{1/2}(\partial\Omega)$. Conversely, if you take a $v \in H^{1/2}(\partial\Omega)$, you can find a $\bar{v} \in H^1(\Omega)$ such that $\bar v = v$ on $\partial \Omega$ and $$ \| \bar{v} \|_{H^1(\Omega)} \leq C \| v \|_{H^{1/2}(\partial\Omega)}. $$ Then you look for $u$ under the form $u = u' + \bar{v}$ so that $u'$ is a solution to $Lu' = f$ with $f = - L\bar{v}$ and $u' = 0$ on $\partial \Omega$. For this problem, you might know that $$ \| u' \|_{H^1(\Omega)} \leq C \| f \|_{H^{-1}(\Omega)} $$ and here you have $$ \|f\|_{H^{-1}(\Omega)} \leq C \| \bar{v} \|_{H^1(\Omega)}. $$ Putting all of this together leads you to the estimate $$ \| u \|_{H^1(\Omega)} \leq C \| v \|_{H^{1/2}(\Omega)}. $$ Now the $H^{1/2}=W^{1/2,2}$ fractional Sobolev norm is bounded above by the $W^{1,\infty}$ norm which you use in your assumption. So, essentially, what you are looking for is indeed valid.
As mentioned above, there are subtleties depending on the exact regularity of $\partial\Omega$ and on the coefficients of $L$.