Trying to understand derivations of the Laplacian in spherical-polar coordinates I've seen on the net and I would like to use Maple to verify a formula which expresses the basis vectors $\hat{x},\hat{y},\hat{z}$ in basisvectors $\hat{r}, \hat{\theta}, \hat{\phi}$, not because it is difficult to do by hand with Cramer's rule but thinking it is useful to know Maple.
I am writing:
f1:=sin(theta)*cos(phi)*x+ sin(theta)*sin(phi)*y+cos(theta)*z;
f2:=cos(theta)*cos(phi)*x+cos(theta)*sin(phi)*y-sin(theta)*z;
f3:=-sin(phi)*x+cos(phi)*y;
eqns:=[f1,f2,f3];
solve(eqns,[x,y,z]);
Why doesn't Maple understand what I want to do? what is missing? (Please link a good text of the derivation of the Laplacian which contains no hand waiving. This is no school assignment!) Edit: This is solved in Octave, giving unitvectors $\hat{x},\hat{y}, \hat{z}$ as
pkg load symbolic; %Octave only
syms theta;
syms phi;
syms x;
syms y;
syms z;
A= [sin(theta)*cos(phi),sin(theta)*sin(phi), cos(theta);...
cos(theta)*cos(phi), cos(theta)*sin(phi), -sin(theta);...
-sin(phi),cos(phi),0]
B=inv(A)
C=simplify(B)```
What do you believe is shown by those Octave computations? Is not the Maple equivalent something more like this: