Let $C$ be a Cantor ternary set. We can write it as union of $\mathfrak{c}$ many disjoint Cantor sets as follows: $$ C\times C= \bigcup_{x\in C} (\{x\}\times C)$$ and clearly $\{x\}\times C$ is Cantor set. Moreover, $(\{x\}\times C) \bigcap (\{y\}\times C)=\emptyset$. So, we can define a homemorhpic between $C$ and $C\times C$ in the natural way just by sending $x$ to $\{x\}\times C$. We can conclude that $C=\bigcup_{\alpha<\mathfrak{c}} C_{\alpha}$ where $C_{\alpha}$'s are pairwise disjoint Cantor set. I have two questions. Kindly check if what I did is correct and Also I know the same fact is correct for perfect, that is, every perfect set can be written as union of $\mathfrak{c}$-many pairwise disjoint perfect sets.
2026-03-26 11:24:15.1774524255
Split perfect and Cantor sets
155 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in CANTOR-SET
- Removing closed sets to form Cantor Middle Third Set
- Show that $C-C=[-1,1].$
- Provide a bijection between power set of natural numbers and the Cantor set in $[0,1]$
- How to refine a covering of the Cantor set by intervals to a covering by disjoint segments?
- Finding a bijection between the Cantor set and $[0, 1]$
- Is there an uncountable collection of pairwise disjoint second category subsets of Cantor space?
- Proof that the set Gamma is the Cantor Middle-thirds Set
- If $f:[a,b]\to\mathbb{R}$ is a function of first class, does it mean that $f$ is continuous everywhere except countably many points in $[a,b]?$
- Binary representation of Cantor set?
- Find an explicit homeomorphism between the Cantor set and a proper subset of the Cantor set
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The function you defined (at least before any edits you might make after I first posted my answer) is NOT a homeomorphism. Indeed, it’s clearly not an injective function. I’ll prove the result for perfect subsets of $\mathbb R$ (similar proofs can be used to prove the result for perfect subsets of ${\mathbb R}^n),$ and I’ll leave it to you or others for generalizations to an arbitrary metric space or beyond.
Theorem: Let $P$ be a nonempty perfect subset of ${\mathbb R}.$ Then $P$ contains $c$-many pairwise disjoint nowhere dense perfect subsets.
Proof 1: First, map $P$ continuously onto $[0,1].$ For intervals this is trivial; for Cantor sets use a monotone increasing function similar to the Cantor function; if both types appear, pick one and work within that subset. Then follow this with a continuous mapping of $[0,1]$ onto the unit square (use a Peano curve). Now observe that the inverse images of the vertical fibers $\{r\} \times [0,1],$ as $r$ varies over $[0,1],$ gives continuum many pairwise disjoint nowhere dense perfect subsets of the given perfect set.
Proof 2: Since $P$ contains a nonempty compact perfect nowhere dense set (simply carry out a Cantor set type construction process relativized to $P),$ without loss of generality we can assume that $P$ is a nonempty compact perfect nowhere dense set. Since $P$ and $P \times P$ are nonempty totally disconnected perfect compact metric spaces, it follows from a classical topological result that $P$ is homeomorphic to $P \times P$ [Willard’s General Topology, Corollary 30.4, p. 217]. Hence, the inverse images of $\{x \} \times P$ for any fixed homeomorphism from $P$ onto $P \times P,$ as $x$ varies over $P,$ gives $c$-many pairwise disjoint perfect subsets of $P.$
The result itself is due to Mahlo (1913) [1] and the first proof above is due to Luzin/Sierpiński (1917) [2].
[1] Friedrich Paul Mahlo, Über teilmengen des kontinuums von dessen mächtigkeit [On subsets of the continuum with its power], Berichte über die Verhandlungen der Königlich Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, Mathematisch-Physische Klasse 65 (1913), 283-315.
[2] Nikolai Nikolaevich Luzin [Lusin] and Wacław Franciszek Sierpiński, Sur une propriété du continu [On a property of the continuum], Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de l’Académie des Sciences (Paris) 165 #16 (15 October 1917), 498-500.