(First time studying rings, and I need some help on this example about radical ideal and fraction ideal)
Let $\sqrt{I}$ be the radical ideal on the commutative ring $R$, defined as $\sqrt{I}=\{r\in R: r^n\in I\ \mathrm{for\ some\ } n\in\mathbb{Z}^{+}\}$. Then, for example, $\sqrt{180\mathbb Z} = 30\mathbb Z$, since $180=2^23^25$, and $30 = 2*3*5$.
Using this example, I can now solve any similar problem, but I do not understand why this method of prime factorization works.
I was also confused about the example regarding a fraction ideal.
$(I:J)=\{x\in R:xJ\subseteq I\}$, where $I, J$ are ideals in $R$.
The example that was given to me was this: $(180\mathbb Z:700\mathbb Z)= 9\mathbb Z$. The method to obtain this is as follows: $180=2^23^25, 700 = 2^25^27$. And we see that $180/gcd(180, 700) = 9$.
I feel like once I see the answer it'll be clear, but as of now I do not see it.
We wish to show that $(m\mathbb{Z} : n\mathbb{Z}) = \frac{m}{(m,n)} \mathbb{Z}$.
Courtesy of Elegant Proof that $m | xn \implies \frac{m}{(m,n)} | x$, I can now give a much simpler proof.
Take $x \in (m\mathbb{Z} : n\mathbb{Z})$. Then, by definition, $xn\mathbb{Z} \subset m\mathbb{Z}$. In particular, this means that there exists $k \in \mathbb{Z}$ such that $xn = mk$. Hence, $m | xn$.
Let $d = (m,n)$. By Bezout's identity, there exist $a,b \in \mathbb{Z}$ such that $am + bn = d$. Thus $amx + bnx = dx$. Since $m | xn$, $m | bnx$. Clearly $m | amx$. Thus, $m | amx + bnx$, i.e. $m | dx$. Thus, there exists $r \in \mathbb{Z}$ such that $mr = dx$. Thus, $x = \frac{m}{d} r$, which shows $x \in \frac{m}{d} \mathbb{Z}$. That is, $x \in \frac{m}{(m,n)} \mathbb{Z}$. Thus, we have shown $(m\mathbb{Z} : n\mathbb{Z}) \subset \frac{m}{(m,n)} \mathbb{Z}$.
For the other containment, take $x \in \frac{m}{(m,n)} \mathbb{Z}$. Then there exists $s \in \mathbb{Z}$ such that $x = \frac{m}{(m,n)} s$. By definition, $\frac{n}{(m,n)} \in \mathbb{Z}$. Thus $t =\frac{ns}{(m,n)} \in \mathbb{Z}$. We compute $$ mt = m \frac{ns}{(m,n)} = n \frac{m}{(m,n)} s = nx = xn $$ Thus, there exists $t \in \mathbb{Z}$ such that $mt = xn$. Hence, for any $j \in \mathbb{Z}$ there exists $k = jt \in \mathbb{Z}$ such that $mk = mjt = mtj = xnj$. That is, for any $j \in \mathbb{Z}$ there exists $k \in \mathbb{Z}$ such that $xnj = mk$. This is precisely the statement that $xn\mathbb{Z} \subset m\mathbb{Z}$, which itself is precisely the statement that $x \in (m\mathbb{Z} : n\mathbb{Z})$. Thus, we have shown $\frac{m}{(m,n)} \mathbb{Z} \subset (m\mathbb{Z} : n\mathbb{Z})$.
We conclude $(m\mathbb{Z} : n\mathbb{Z}) = \frac{m}{(m,n)} \mathbb{Z}$.