When I describe a simple system with spring-damper feedback with 4 states variables, I obtain a transfer function or canonical form of this transfer function with 3 poles and a reduced form with order 3. Why ? some state variables can be contracted ? You can see code from from maxima
2026-03-26 01:11:05.1774487465
State representation : I have less order of canonical form than state variables
63 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CONTROL-THEORY
- MIT rule VS Lyapunov design - Adaptive Control
- Question on designing a state observer for discrete time system
- Do I really need quadratic programming to do a Model Predictive Controller?
- Understanding Definition of Switching Sequence
- understanding set of controllable state for switched system
- understanding solution of state equation
- Derive Anti Resonance Frequency from Transfer Function
- Laplace Transforms, show the relationship between the 2 expressions
- Laplace transform of a one-sided full-wave rectified...
- Controlled Markov process - proper notation and set up
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?


Your question and approach is unclear but from what I understand, you had a fourth order transfer function and when you transformed it into canonical form, you got a third order system. If this is indeed the case, it is not unusual. You are probably obtaining a minimum realization of the system (happens with pole-zero cancellations).