Does anyone have a clever method for finding the solution to this PDE? $$0=\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\left((Ax+C(x-y))p(x,y)\right)+\frac{\partial}{\partial y}\left((By+C(y-x))p(x,y)\right)+D\left[\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}+\frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2}+2E\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x\partial y}\right]p(x,y)$$ for $p(x,y)$ given that $A,B,C,D,E$ are all positive constants with $0<E<1$. It is trivial for $E=0$ but I don't know how to deal with the cross derivative.
2026-04-20 13:22:51.1776691371
Stationary solution multidimensional Fokker-Planck equation/PDE
1.2k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PARTIAL-DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS
- PDE Separation of Variables Generality
- Partial Derivative vs Total Derivative: Function depending Implicitly and Explicitly on Variable
- Transition from theory of PDEs to applied analysis and industrial problems and models with PDEs
- Harmonic Functions are Analytic Evan’s Proof
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- How might we express a second order PDE as a system of first order PDE's?
- Inhomogeneous biharmonic equation on $\mathbb{R}^d$
- PDE: Determine the region above the $x$-axis for which there is a classical solution.
- Division in differential equations when the dividing function is equal to $0$
Related Questions in STOCHASTIC-PROCESSES
- Interpreting stationary distribution $P_{\infty}(X,V)$ of a random process
- Probability being in the same state
- Random variables coincide
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- Why does there exists a random variable $x^n(t,\omega')$ such that $x_{k_r}^n$ converges to it
- Compute the covariance of $W_t$ and $B_t=\int_0^t\mathrm{sgn}(W)dW$, for a Brownian motion $W$
- Why has $\sup_{s \in (0,t)} B_s$ the same distribution as $\sup_{s \in (0,t)} B_s-B_t$ for a Brownian motion $(B_t)_{t \geq 0}$?
- What is the name of the operation where a sequence of RV's form the parameters for the subsequent one?
- Markov property vs. transition function
- Variance of the integral of a stochastic process multiplied by a weighting function
Related Questions in STATIONARY-PROCESSES
- Is $X_t$ a wide-sense stationary process?
- Absorbing Markov chain and almost sure convergence
- Mean value of a strict-sense stationary stochastic process
- Stationarity of ARMA model
- The Law of Total Covariance on a Gaussian Process
- application of Markov Chain and stationary distribution
- (Weak) Convergence of stationary distributions under tightness
- Durrett Stationary sequence counterexample
- Showing $\lim\limits_{R \uparrow \infty} \frac{1}{R^3} \int_{-R}^R \psi^2 (w,x) \, dx = 0$
- Weak stationarity for a stochastic process $\{X(t) \}$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
This is a linear Fokker-Planck equation, so the solution is a Gaussian. The only parameters, the averages (which are zeros in this case) and variances, can be found by brute force, but the following method see for example van Kampen, page 212 is somewhat easier.
We will change the notation a bit for convenience $$ \sum_{i,j=1}^2 \frac{ \partial }{ \partial x_i } (A_{ij} x_j P) + B_{ij} \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x_i \partial x_j} P = 0. \qquad (1) $$
Let us first compute the Fourier transform (characteristic function) $$ G(k_1, k_2) = \int_{-\infty}^\infty \int_{-\infty}^\infty P(x_1, x_2) \, \exp\left(\sum_{i=1}^2 i k_i x_i\right) \, dx_1 \, dx_2. $$ Now by multiplying $\exp\left(\sum_{i=1}^2 i k_i x_i\right)$ and integrating by parts, we get $$ -\sum_{i,j=1}^2 k_i A_{ij} \frac{ \partial G } { \partial k_j } -k_i \, k_j \, B_{ij} \, G = 0. $$ At this point, we can impose that the generating function is Gaussian, and $$ \log G(k_1, k_2) = -\frac{1}{2} \sum_{i,j=1}^2 k_i \Xi_{ij} k_j, $$ where $\Xi_{ij}$ is the symmetric covariance matrix of $\operatorname{cov}(x_i, x_j)$. This quadratic form can also be readily shown by using the method of characteristics. Thus $$ \sum_{i,j,l=1}^2 k_i \, A_{ij} \, \Xi_{jl} \, k_l = \sum_{i,l} k_i \, B_{il} \, k_l. $$ Since this equation holds for all values of $k_1$ and $k_2$, and $B_{ij}$ is symmetric, we must have $$ \sum_{j = 1}^2 A_{ij} \Xi_{jl} + \Xi_{ij} A_{lj} = 2 \, B_{il}. $$ Or in matrix form $$ \mathbf{ A \Xi} + \mathbf{\Xi A}^T = 2 \, \mathbf B. \qquad (2) $$ Now this is the Lyapunov equation, and the solution (the integral form) is $$ \mathbf \Xi = 2 \int_0^\infty \exp(-\mathbf A \, t) \, \mathbf B \, \exp(-\mathbf A^T \, t) \, dt. \qquad (3) $$ In our case, this expression converges because $\mathbf A$ is positive-definite ($\operatorname{tr}\mathbf A = A + B + 2 C > 0$, and $\operatorname{det}\mathbf A = AB+BC+CA > 0$). And we can verify it directly $$ \begin{aligned} \mathbf {A \Xi + \Xi A}^T &= -2\int_0^\infty \left[ \frac{d}{dt} \left[\exp(-\mathbf A t) \right]\, \mathbf B \, \exp(-\mathbf A^T t) + \exp(-\mathbf A t) \, \mathbf B \, \frac{d}{dt} \exp(-\mathbf A^T t) \right] \, dt \\ &= -2\exp(-\mathbf A t) \, \mathbf B \, \exp(-\mathbf A^T t) \Bigg|_0^\infty = 2 \, \mathbf B. \end{aligned} $$
In summary, the distribution is a two-dimensional Gaussian, $$ P(\mathbf x) = \frac{1}{2 \pi \sqrt{\operatorname{det} \mathbf \Xi}} \exp\left( - \frac{1}{2} \mathbf x \mathbf \Xi^{-1} \mathbf x^T \right). $$ with the covariance matrix $\mathbf \Xi$ given by (3).
Edit. There is a simpler solution. Since the solution is a Gaussian centered at zero, we only need to determine the covariant matrix, which can done as follows.
Multiplying (1) by $x_r x_s$ and integrating over $dx_1 dx_2$, we get $$ -\int_{-\infty}^\infty\int_{-\infty}^\infty \left[ \sum_{j=1}^2 \left( x_s A_{rj}x_j + x_r A_{sj} x_j \right) +(B_{rs} + B_{sr}) \right]\, P \, dx_1 \, dx_2 = 0. $$ Since $\mathbf B$ is symmetric, this means $$ \sum_{j=1}^2 \left[ A_{rj} \operatorname{cov}(x_j, x_s) + \operatorname{cov}(x_r, x_j) A_{sj} \right] + 2 B_{rs} = 0, $$ which is just the component form as (2). Then the solution (3) follows.